Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Full-dimensional J-chambers lie in the relative interior

Statement

Let (W,S) be a finite-rank Coxeter system in its canonical real representation V=RS, with basis (αs), dual Θ, root system Φ, contragredient action, and Tits cone U. For I⊆S put EI={f:f(αi)=0 (i∈I)} and CI={f∈EI:f(αs)>0 (s∉I)}. Fix J⊆S and put E=EJ, T=U∩E, and T∘=int⁡ET. If x∈W, I⊆S, xCI⊆E and ∣I∣=∣J∣, then xEI=E, the set xCI is open in E, and xCI⊆T∘. In particular every Iyama–Wemyss J-chamber lies in T∘.

External input

Iyama–Wemyss, Definition 1.6(1), calls xCI a J-chamber precisely when xCI⊆EJ and ∣I∣=∣J∣, with x representing a coset in W/WI.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Coordinate faces and their translates span their annihilator spaces and are relatively open by Coordinate faces span their annihilator subspaces.

[F2]

The dual Coxeter action is invertible and U contains every xCI by Tits cone geometry with its exact interior boundary.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement. Goal: Establish its conclusion.

Iyama–Wemyss, Definition 1.6(1), calls xCI a J-chamber precisely when xCI⊆EJ and ∣I∣=∣J∣, with x representing a coset in W/WI.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

By [F1], the inclusion xCI⊆E implies xEI⊆E. Both spaces have dimension ∣S∣−∣J∣, because x is invertible and ∣I∣=∣J∣. Hence xEI=E, and [F1] makes xCI open in E.

2.1step 1.1F2given∎

By [F2], xCI⊆U∩E=T. An open subset of E contained in T lies in int⁡ET. The external definition identifies all source J-chambers with sets satisfying these hypotheses, giving the final assertion.

Source notes

The external statement is used only as explicitly recorded above. It is an independent prerequisite source, not the article under study. The local topology and linear-algebra argument is authored here; the source proof has not been reviewed.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Osamu Iyama and Michael Wemyss, Tits Cone Intersections and Applications, author-hosted draft · Definition 1.6(1), printed p. 6 (PDF p. 30)

Iyama–Wemyss, Definition 1.6(1), calls $xC_I$ a $J$-chamber precisely when $xC_I\subseteq E_J$ and $|I|=|J|$, with $x$ representing a coset in $W/W_I$.

Hypotheses: Finite Coxeter graph, canonical real reflection representation and dual action; arbitrary vertex subset J, not required spherical. Our I is the source secondary subset, and our J is the source fixed subset.

Reading limits: Retrieved this author-hosted PDF and read §§1.3–1.5 definitions and Theorem 1.12 statement (printed pp. 4–7); visually inspected PDF pp. 30–31 for the subset notation and labels. No source proof review or claim of local reconstruction; no infinite-rank topology or local-finiteness result imported.

Sources