How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coordinate faces span their annihilator subspaces
Statement
Let be a real vector space with finite basis , let , and put , . Then is nonempty, relatively open in , and spans . For any linear automorphism of , is relatively open in and spans . These assertions include , where .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Coordinate dual functionals and the coordinate Euclidean metric on , restricted to subspaces for relative topology, are supplied by Annihilators, relative hyperplanes and complexification. Write and .
The span of a subset is the smallest linear subspace containing it; a subset spans a space when that span is the whole space (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S).
A linear automorphism is an invertible linear self-map; its inverse is linear and satisfies both inverse equations (Invertible linear maps, linear isomorphisms, and inverse linear maps).
A subset of a metric space is open precisely when each of its points has a positive-radius ball contained in the subset (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement). Here the metrics on and are restrictions of the coordinate Euclidean metric in [F1].
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses of the statement, with the coordinate metrics in [F1]. Goal: Establish all the stated conclusions.
If , then , which is nonempty, open in itself and spans itself; also by linearity. All conclusions hold in this case, including . Henceforth suppose . In dual coordinates is the subspace with coordinates zero on , and belongs to . For each , both and belong to , so every subspace containing contains their difference . Every equals ; thus spans .
For put . If and , then for each , so . Thus the ball of radius about in lies in . This proves relative openness.
Let be the coordinate matrix of the linear inverse and put . For any and , linearity and give . Fix and . If and , then and for every . Hence and . This supplies a positive-radius ball in about every , proving relative openness directly. Finally every subspace containing contains for , and these vectors span by applying to the coordinate expansion in step 1.1. Since , it spans . Together with step 1.1 this also covers the zero-dimensional case.
Depends on
- Annihilators, relative hyperplanes and complexification
- Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing S
- Invertible linear maps, linear isomorphisms, and inverse linear maps
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.