How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vertex-group exact sequence of a normal groupoid cover
PDF p. 6: §2.4, (2.10) and following sentence; PDF p. 2: §1.2.1 before Theorem 1.3: universal-cover deck group
Statement
Let be a normal covering of nonempty connected small groupoids, and let . A vertex group consists of all arrows from the specified object to itself. Use left-to-right arrow products and ordinary composition of deck functors. Then there is an exact sequence of groups
Here denotes the trivial group. For group homomorphisms , exactness at means ; the displayed sequence requires this equality at each of its three intervening groups. The maps from and to are the unique homomorphisms.
For , the deck transformation sends to the target of the unique lift of with source . In particular, if is universal, then .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The covering, base objects, and conventions in the Statement.
A covering has a unique lift of each base arrow from each prescribed object over its source. A universal covering has trivial vertex groups upstairs. Groupoid coverings, universal and normal covers
For a connected normal covering, the induced map on the chosen vertex group is injective, its image is normal in , and the quotient is isomorphic to the deck group by the map sending to the deck transformation that takes to the target of the lift of . These statements use the multiplication conventions in the Statement. Independent groupoid covering and universal-cover input
For a normal subgroup of a group , the quotient map , , is surjective and has kernel . Indeed, the coset product gives , every coset has a representative, the quotient identity is , and exactly when . The quotient group G/N and coset product (gN)(hN)=ghN
For a group homomorphism , its kernel is and its image is . Use exactness as defined in the Statement, including the unique homomorphisms from and to the trivial group. The kernel and image of a group homomorphism
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement.
Goal: Prove the exact sequence, the description of , and the universal-cover consequence.
By [F2], embeds the upstairs vertex group in with normal image . Compose the quotient map with the isomorphism in [F2] and call the composite . By [F3] it is surjective with kernel , while the first map is injective. Thus the displayed sequence is exact. The stated endpoint description of is the defining description of the isomorphism in [F2], with the unique lift supplied by [F1].
If is universal, [F1] makes trivial, so is trivial. The normality criterion in the groupoid-covering input applies because the trivial subgroup is normal; hence the preceding construction applies to a universal connected covering. The quotient by the trivial subgroup is canonically isomorphic to , and [F2] identifies it with . This proves the final assertion.
Source notes
The article citation records attribution of the original assertion. The proof above uses the independently authored groupoid-covering input and the quotient-group and kernel/image definitions; exactness is defined inline.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · PDF p. 6, §2.4, (2.10) and following sentence (normal-cover exact sequence and endpoint map); PDF p. 2, §1.2.1 before Theorem 1.3 (universal-cover deck-group assertion)