How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Empty-subset wall crossings are simple reflections
PDF p. 11: Remark 3.16
Statement
Let be a Coxeter system with simple generators indexed by the vertices of a Coxeter diagram . For , write . An associate of is a subset for which is conjugate to , as in Associates of a parabolic subset. The empty subset is its only associate.
For every , the connected-support notation of Connected component notation [I,a] gives , the group is cyclic of order two, and the simple wall-crossing element of Simple wall-crossing elements and maps is .
Proof
Given: the Coxeter system and vertex in the Statement.
[F1] The generators satisfy , and in the standard geometric representation for a nonzero basis vector . Word length is the least length of a word in the simple generators. Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions
[F2] The standard parabolic is generated by the for ; in particular . Standard parabolic subgroups and parabolic roots
[F3] The set is the component containing in the diagram induced on . Connected component notation [I,a]
[F4] For finite , is its maximum-length element; . Longest parabolic elements and opposition permutation
[F5] A pair lies in exactly when and has minimum word length in . For such a label, if , and is finite, the wall-crossing definition gives . Algebraic chamber-label set Simple wall-crossing elements and maps
Proof technique: direct.
Goal: prove the associate, component, group-order and wall-crossing assertions.
Associates. By [F1], acts nontrivially on , so for every vertex . By [F2], a nonempty has for some , so is nontrivial. Since a conjugate of is again , no nonempty is an associate of . The empty subset is an associate of itself by conjugation by .
Rank one. The induced diagram on has only the vertex , so [F3] gives . By [F1] and [F2], and its two elements are distinct; hence it is cyclic of order two. In particular, is finite. The identity has length zero, while the nonidentity generator has length one. Thus [F4] gives and .
Chamber label and wall crossing. Set and . By [F2], . The identity is the only element in this coset and has word length zero by [F1], so it has minimum length there. The chamber-label criterion in [F5] therefore gives . Also by the given choice of vertex. Step 1.2 establishes the remaining finiteness hypothesis, so [F5] applies and gives . Together with steps 1.1 and 1.2 this proves the Statement.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · PDF p. 11, Remark 3.16