How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Algebraic chamber-label set
PDF p. 9: (3.10)
Definition
Let be a Coxeter system with , where the index set may be infinite. Let be the least number of simple generators in a word representing . For , let be the standard parabolic subgroup generated by those simple generators. Fix .
The algebraic chamber-label set is . Here is the set of all subsets of , and and . Thus the length condition says that has minimal length in the coset .
Definition references
Justification
The Coxeter-system definition supplies the group and its finite-valued word-length function. The standard parabolic definition supplies the subgroups and for every indicated subset, including the empty subset. Group multiplication therefore defines both displayed cosets, and the equality and length inequalities specify a property of each member of the set . The displayed comprehension consequently defines a set. It is nonempty: the identity element has length zero, , and satisfies the length condition. No uniqueness of a minimal coset representative or geometric identification of these labels is needed for the definition.
Depends on
Used by · 26
- Labelling theorem for relative chambers
- Minimal coset representatives remove chamber-label ambiguity
- Simple wall-crossing elements and maps
- The printed root characterization of a wall-crossing element
- Empty-subset wall crossings are simple reflections
- Length additivity and the base-chamber half-space
- Finite wall-crossing connectivity
- Normaliser action on labels, orbits and adjacency
- The relative normaliser action need not be chamber-transitive
- Chamber paths, concatenation and wall words
- Translation between relative arrangements in the geodesic argument
- Universal wall groupoid on relative chambers
- The universal wall groupoid is generated by adjacent crossings
- Natural functors to the universal wall groupoid
- Root bases and nonnegative matrices for chamber labels
- Correspondence between chamber labels and Brink–Howlett morphisms
- Universal Brink–Howlett covering and its deck group
- Codimension-two relations
- Geodesics differ by codimension-two relations
- Assignment from wall crossings to ribbon generators
- D4 chamber labels and complete adjacency graph
- Normaliser-action wording in the D4 exposition
- Eight-element D4 normaliser quotient vertex group
- Universal wall graph as a groupoid Cayley graph
- Common relative facets have one enlarged standard subset
- A finite connected component gives the opposite relative chamber
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · PDF p. 9, Theorem 3.9 and equation (3.10)