Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Codimension-two relations

PDF p. 21: Definition 4.25

Definition

Let (W,S) be a finite-rank Coxeter system with diagram vertex set Γ0 and geometric roots Φ. For L⊆Γ0, let WL be the subgroup generated by the simple reflections indexed by L, and put ΦL={wαi:w∈WL, i∈L}. Fix J⊆Γ0 and a relative chamber label (x,I)∈Cham(J), meaning that WJx=xWI and x has minimum length in xWI.

A chamber path in the relative arrangement (Cone(J)∘,HJ) is a finite nonempty sequence of chambers with consecutive chambers adjacent; its length is the number of successive pairs. It is geodesic when its length is minimal among chamber paths with the same endpoints. For an eligible vertex a∉I, write ωa,I for the simple wall crossing at (x,I) as defined in Simple wall-crossing elements and maps.

Choose distinct a,b∈Γ0∖I such that ∣ΦI∪{a,b}∖ΦI∣<∞. Let q=va,b,I:I→K be the two-generator element of Two-generator minimal common left multiple. The two-geodesic lemma supplies exactly two geodesic paths pa,pb from (x,I) to (xq,K), beginning respectively with ωa,I and ωb,I. The formal relation pa=pb identifying these paths is called a codimension-two relation.

Justification

By Two-geodesic wall-crossing lemma, the stated hypotheses give exactly the two paths with the stated endpoints and initial crossings. Their ordered pair therefore determines the displayed formal identification; the definition does not assert that the two paths are equal as sequences of chambers.

Source notes

The article attributes this terminology to [24, Definition 1.58]. Its Definition 4.25 is cited for attribution; the path existence and uniqueness used in the justification come from the declared two-geodesic lemma.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources