How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Codimension-two relations
PDF p. 21: Definition 4.25
Definition
Let be a finite-rank Coxeter system with diagram vertex set and geometric roots . For , let be the subgroup generated by the simple reflections indexed by , and put . Fix and a relative chamber label , meaning that and has minimum length in .
A chamber path in the relative arrangement is a finite nonempty sequence of chambers with consecutive chambers adjacent; its length is the number of successive pairs. It is geodesic when its length is minimal among chamber paths with the same endpoints. For an eligible vertex , write for the simple wall crossing at as defined in Simple wall-crossing elements and maps.
Choose distinct such that . Let be the two-generator element of Two-generator minimal common left multiple. The two-geodesic lemma supplies exactly two geodesic paths from to , beginning respectively with and . The formal relation identifying these paths is called a codimension-two relation.
Justification
By Two-geodesic wall-crossing lemma, the stated hypotheses give exactly the two paths with the stated endpoints and initial crossings. Their ordered pair therefore determines the displayed formal identification; the definition does not assert that the two paths are equal as sequences of chambers.
Source notes
The article attributes this terminology to [24, Definition 1.58]. Its Definition 4.25 is cited for attribution; the path existence and uniqueness used in the justification come from the declared two-geodesic lemma.
Depends on
- Coxeter-system, roots, length and weak-order conventions
- Standard parabolic subgroups and parabolic roots
- Algebraic chamber-label set
- Geodesic chamber paths
- Simple wall-crossing elements and maps
- Two-generator minimal common left multiple
- Two-geodesic wall-crossing lemma
- Tits cone intersections, relative roots and arrangements
- Chambers, walls and adjacency
- Labelling theorem for relative chambers
- Chamber paths, concatenation and wall words
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · PDF p. 21, Definition 4.25 and Lemma 4.23