How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chamber paths, concatenation and wall words
PDF p. 13: §3.4 before Proposition 3.29
Definition
Work in the finite-rank relative chamber arrangement with fixed and Coxeter group of the adjacent-wall formula. Its chambers are labelled by pairs : and has minimum word length in . A chamber is a connected component of the arrangement complement; two distinct chambers are adjacent when they share a wall, meaning a codimension-one intersection of a chamber closure with an arrangement hyperplane.
A path is a finite nonempty sequence of chamber labels such that each consecutive pair labels adjacent chambers. Its source is , its target is , and its length is . If and , their concatenation is .
For each consecutive pair, let be the index supplied by the adjacent-wall formula, so that . The length-one path consisting of this pair is called a simple wall crossing, and is denoted . Thus is the ordered concatenation of its simple wall crossings when . Define its wall word element by , where each is the simple wall-crossing element. When , the empty product is the identity of .
Definition references
Justification
The relative-cone definition specifies the relative arrangement in its finite-dimensional real Coxeter setting. The relative chamber-labelling theorem identifies its chambers bijectively with the algebraic labels, and the chamber and label definitions specify the objects and adjacency relation. The adjacent-wall formula supplies a unique crossing index for each ordered adjacent pair and ensures that the corresponding crossing element is defined. Hence the finite sequence determines its ordered list of crossing elements and their product in uniquely. When two endpoints match, omitting the repeated endpoint leaves the original consecutive adjacencies on both sides of the join, so concatenation is again a path. The one-chamber case has no crossings and its product is the group identity.
Source notes
The article reference attributes the terminology and construction. The well-definedness argument uses the declared local definitions and adjacent-wall formula.
Depends on
Used by · 9
- Geodesic chamber paths
- Translation between relative arrangements in the geodesic argument
- Geodesics are exactly length-additive wall words
- Positive arrangement category and its groupoid completion
- The universal wall groupoid is generated by adjacent crossings
- Natural functors to the universal wall groupoid
- Standard expressions correspond to geodesics
- Codimension-two relations
- Explicit D4 comparison functors
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Normalisers of parabolic subgroups of Artin–Tits groups and Tits cone intersections · PDF p. 13, §3.4, before Proposition 3.29