Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strict numerical budgets for the two-stage PSD amplification

Statement

Let 0<a≤1/5, −1<c−≤0≤c+, s=1+c−, w=c+−c−>0, B=1+c++a, T=1+4c+−3c−=s+4w, and L0=log⁡(B/(2a)). Suppose 32aTL0/s2<1. Put δ=s/(2w), q=1+δ, and K=⌈L0/log⁡q⌉. Then a/s<1/32, a<1/32, qK≥B/(2a), and Karcsin⁡(8a/s)<π/8, ∑j=K∞(π/2)4B/(sqj)≤4πa(s+2w)/s2<π/8.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The principal inverse sine and the bounds arcsin⁡v≤πv/2 for 0≤v≤1 and log⁡(1+v)≥2v/(2+v) for v≥0 are supplied by Angular order and elementary inverse-trigonometric bounds. The logarithmic bound is strict when v>0.

[F2]

The ceiling ⌈x⌉ is the least integer at least x. For q>1, b>0 and an integer k≥0, ∑j=k∞bq−j=bq−kq/(q−1) (Geometric growth, truncation and total decrement budgets).

[F3]

The natural logarithm is defined on the positive reals, is strictly increasing, satisfies log⁡1=0, and obeys log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y for x,y>0 (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

Proof

Given: The data and hypotheses of the Statement.

Goal: Establish the two parameter bounds, the lower bound on qK, and both strict angle budgets in the Statement.

1.1givenF1F3algebra

Since B≥1+a and a≤1/5, B/(2a)≥3. Applying the strict logarithmic bound of [F1] at v=2 gives log⁡3>1, and [F3] gives L0≥log⁡3>1. Also 0<s≤1, w>0, and T=s+4w>s. Hence 32a/s<32aTL0/s2<1, so a/s<1/32 and a<1/32. In particular 0<8a/s<1/4.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

We have δ>0, q>1, and log⁡q>0 by [F3]. Put x=L0/log⁡q>0. By [F2], K=⌈x⌉ is a positive integer and K≥x. Applying the product law in [F3] repeatedly to the K factors of qK gives log⁡(qK)=Klog⁡q≥L0=log⁡(B/(2a)). Strict logarithmic monotonicity therefore gives qK≥B/(2a).

3.1givenF1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

By [F1] at v=δ, log⁡q≥2δ/(2+δ). If 0<x≤1, the least-integer characterization gives K=1, so 32aK/s<1 by step 1.1. If x>1, minimality of K implies K−1<x, hence K<x+1≤2x. Therefore K≤2L0/log⁡q≤(2+δ)L0/δ=TL0/s, and the stated strict hypothesis again gives 32aK/s<1. Since 0<8a/s<1/4, the inverse-sine estimate of [F1] applies and yields Karcsin⁡(8a/s)≤4πaK/s<π/8.

4.1givenF2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Apply the geometric-series identity in [F2] with b=2πB/s>0 and k=K≥1. It gives ∑j=K∞(π/2)4B/(sqj)=2πBq/(sδqK)≤4πaq/(sδ)=4πa(s+2w)/s2, using q−1=δ and step 2.1. Since w>0 and L0>1, s+2w<T<TL0. Thus the last expression is strictly less than 4πaTL0/s2<π/8. Together with steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 this proves every stated conclusion.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.