How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strict numerical budgets for the two-stage PSD amplification
Statement
Let , , , , , , and . Suppose . Put , , and . Then , , , and , .
Facts & Assumptions
The principal inverse sine and the bounds for and for are supplied by Angular order and elementary inverse-trigonometric bounds. The logarithmic bound is strict when .
The ceiling is the least integer at least . For , and an integer , (Geometric growth, truncation and total decrement budgets).
The natural logarithm is defined on the positive reals, is strictly increasing, satisfies , and obeys for (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses of the Statement.
Goal: Establish the two parameter bounds, the lower bound on , and both strict angle budgets in the Statement.
Since and , . Applying the strict logarithmic bound of [F1] at gives , and [F3] gives . Also , , and . Hence , so and . In particular .
We have , , and by [F3]. Put . By [F2], is a positive integer and . Applying the product law in [F3] repeatedly to the factors of gives . Strict logarithmic monotonicity therefore gives .
By [F1] at , . If , the least-integer characterization gives , so by step 1.1. If , minimality of implies , hence . Therefore , and the stated strict hypothesis again gives . Since , the inverse-sine estimate of [F1] applies and yields .
Apply the geometric-series identity in [F2] with and . It gives , using and step 2.1. Since and , . Thus the last expression is strictly less than . Together with steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 this proves every stated conclusion.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.