How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transfer two nonbacktracking good events to the required norm bound
Statement
Let be a finite simple graph on ordered vertices, with adjacency matrix . Let be the all-ones matrix and the identity matrix. Write for the degree of vertex in this order and . Let , , and . All matrix norms below are Euclidean operator norms on . For a matrix , its nonbacktracking matrix is indexed by all ordered vertex pairs and has . Write . If and , then .
Facts & Assumptions
The operator norm on bounded linear maps between normed spaces satisfies the triangle inequality and absolute homogeneity (The operator norm is a norm on the space of bounded linear operators). The finite-dimensional operator norm used here is the maximum over the Euclidean unit sphere (The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_‖ v‖=1‖ Tv‖).
For a Hermitian matrix , set and . If , Theorem 2.2 gives , where for and for .
In an ordered finite simple graph, is symmetric with zero diagonal; row has entries equal to one and off-diagonal entries equal to zero (The adjacency matrix of a finite simple graph, Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree).
External input
For a matrix , its nonbacktracking matrix is indexed by ordered vertex pairs and has . Write . For a Hermitian matrix , set and . If , Theorem 2.2 gives , where for and for .
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Prove its conclusions.
Since and , we have . For any matrix on , let be its finite unit-sphere maximum from [F1]. For , rescaling to gives ; the same inequality holds at zero. Thus is bounded, and its unit-ball supremum equals , since it is at most and the unit ball contains the unit sphere. Consequently the triangle inequality and absolute homogeneity in [F1] apply to our finite-dimensional matrix norm. Also for every unit vector, so .
Let be as in [F2] and put . By [F3], is real symmetric, hence Hermitian, with zero diagonal. Its off-diagonal entries are at adjacent vertices and otherwise. Hence and , so . For , : if it is , and if it is . Thus [F2] and give . If , every entry of vanishes and this bound is immediate.
Since , step 1.1 and step 1.2 give , the last comparison using .
Depends on
- The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_‖ v‖=1‖ Tv‖
- The adjacency matrix of a finite simple graph
- Adjacency, incidence, open and closed neighbourhoods, vertex degree, minimum degree and maximum degree
- The operator norm is a norm on the space of bounded linear operators
- Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces E_λ(T)=ker(T-λ I), and the spectrum σ_F(T) of an endomorphism
- Benaych-Georges, Bordenave and Knowles, Spectral radii of sparse random matrices (19 September 2019) · PDF p. 3, Definition 2.1; p. 4, Theorem 2.2
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For a Hermitian matrix $H$, set $r=\max_i(\sum_j|H_{ij}|^2)^{1/2}$ and $b=\max_{ij}|H_{ij}|$. If $r>0$, Theorem 2.2 gives $\|H\|\le r f(\rho(B)/r)+7b$, where $f(x)=2$ for $0\le x\le1$ and $f(x)=x+x^{-1}$ for $x\ge1$.
Hypotheses: Finite Hermitian H; the nonbacktracking matrix is defined by the displayed ordered-pair formula. Treat H=0 separately.
Reading limits: Checked the extracted PDF text on pp. 3–4 for Definition 2.1, the matrix norm conventions and Theorem 2.2, including its full deterministic Hermitian hypothesis. The theorem is imported; its proof and the remaining paper were not reconstructed or fully read.
Sources
- Benaych-Georges, Bordenave and Knowles, Spectral radii of sparse random matrices (19 September 2019) · PDF p. 3, Definition 2.1; p. 4, Theorem 2.2