How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular critical PSD phases: a direct mass bootstrap at 0.0816
Statement
Let , and let be a finite nonempty undirected graph with symmetric binary adjacency (loops allowed), every row sum equal to , and . Let be a critical point of with positive-semidefinite angular Hessian. Rotate and choose representatives in so is real. Write , , for and otherwise, and . Then , , and for each , with . In particular for .
Facts & Assumptions
Use the graph, phase, algebraic and analytic interfaces of Homogeneous Kuramoto energy, Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation, Finite phase tori, local lifts and the flat metric, Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives, Angular order and elementary inverse-trigonometric bounds. Every configuration assumed here is a critical point with positive-semidefinite Hessian; local minimality is never inferred from that condition.
In the open angular boxes of Finite phase tori, local lifts and the flat metric, the finite cosine sum defining the energy has continuous second derivatives. A critical point has zero coordinate gradient and its angular Hessian is the matrix of second partial derivatives (The Hessian matrix and critical points of a scalar field). Positive semidefiniteness means for every real coordinate vector , where is that Hessian (Positive definite, negative definite, semidefinite, and indefinite quadratic forms). Changes between these angular lifts are locally translations, so the gradient and Hessian conventions agree on overlaps.
Vector norms and adjoints are those of the finite-dimensional complex vertex space Finite vertex Hilbert space in the article convention; matrix norms are its induced operator norms (The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_‖ v‖=1‖ Tv‖). Scaling a nonzero vector to a unit vector gives , and the inequality also holds for . Cauchy–Schwarz gives (Cauchy–Schwarz: |⟨ u,v⟩|≤‖ u‖‖ v‖, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors). Its linear-first convention has the same norm and absolute pairing as the vertex convention.
A real symmetric quadratic form nonnegative on real vectors is nonnegative on complex vectors: for , . For real symmetric weights , its Laplacian has quadratic form , including signed weights (Real symmetric quadratic forms tested on phasors).
For the finite symmetric binary adjacency in this statement, including loops, Gradient and Hessian formulas gives the angular gradient components and the Hessian , where . Diagonal loop terms cancel from the Hessian, and the formulas are independent of angular lifts.
Proof
Given: The hypotheses of the Statement.
Goal: Establish its conclusions directly for critical PSD phases.
Apply [F5] to the energy in an open angular box. Its hypotheses hold because the vertex set is finite and nonempty and is symmetric and binary, with loops permitted. By [F2], criticality makes the gradient vanish; reversing the sine difference gives . The Hessian is the real symmetric matrix with . By [F4], for every complex . Its real coordinate-vector test shows . Adding proves , and criticality gives the phasor identity.
Set , and . Both vectors have squared norm , so [F3] and the norm bound give , , while by regularity. The PSD test in step 1.1, using , gives . Using yields .
Since and , [F3] gives for . By step 1.1, . Its imaginary part is . For , its real part is at least , so the sum of its squared real and imaginary parts is at least . Thus for every , giving . With from step 2.1, this is . Put , so . Since , we have . Inserting this into step 2.1 gives . Therefore .
On the tail , directly from the piecewise definition and sine monotonicity on (equivalently, cosine monotonicity there and ). Summing gives . Every argument above uses criticality and PSD rather than a local-minimum hypothesis.
Depends on
- Homogeneous Kuramoto energy
- Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation
- Finite phase tori, local lifts and the flat metric
- Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives
- Angular order and elementary inverse-trigonometric bounds
- The Hessian matrix and critical points of a scalar field
- Positive definite, negative definite, semidefinite, and indefinite quadratic forms
- Finite vertex Hilbert space in the article convention
- The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_‖ v‖=1‖ Tv‖
- Cauchy–Schwarz: |⟨ u,v⟩|≤‖ u‖‖ v‖, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors
- Real symmetric quadratic forms tested on phasors
- Gradient and Hessian formulas
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.