How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homogeneous Kuramoto energy
PDF p. 2: Section 1, homogeneous model; PDF p. 3: Equation (1.2); PDF p. 10: Section 2, energy formula
Definition
Let be a finite undirected graph with nonempty vertex set, allowing self-loops, and let be its symmetric adjacency matrix: when and otherwise. A phase state is an element of , identified with ; a lift of is a real vector representing its equivalence class.
The homogeneous Kuramoto energy is the function defined by
The sum is over ordered pairs of vertices, and the phase differences in the cosine are evaluated using any real lift of .
Definition references
Facts & Assumptions
Two real vectors represent the same phase state exactly when their coordinate differences are integer multiples of (Finite phase tori, local lifts and the flat metric).
Cosine is real-valued on real arguments and is unchanged when its argument is shifted by an integer multiple of (Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives).
The graph has finitely many vertices and a real symmetric binary adjacency matrix, with a diagonal entry for each self-loop (Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation).
Justification
Given: A graph and phase state as in the definition, together with two real lifts of that state.
Goal: Show that the displayed formula assigns one real number to the phase state independently of the lift.
1.1 By [F1], the two lifts differ coordinatewise by integer multiples of . For any ordered pair , the corresponding differences of their and coordinates therefore differ by an integer multiple of . By [F2], the two cosine values are equal. [given, F1, F2]
2.1 By [F3], the ordered-pair sum has finitely many terms and each coefficient is real; by [F2], each cosine value is real. Thus the formula is a real number. Step 1.1 shows that every summand is unchanged by replacing the lift, so the resulting real number is independent of the lift. This defines the stated function on . [F2, F3, step 1.1] ∎
The formula and its use for the homogeneous model are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF page 3, equation (1.2), and page 10. The justification uses the mathematical suppliers above.
Source notes
The formula and its use for the homogeneous model are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF page 3, equation (1.2), and page 10. The justification uses the mathematical suppliers above.
Depends on
Used by · 29
- Gradient and Hessian formulas
- Self-loops do not affect Kuramoto dynamics
- Rotating-frame gradient formulation
- Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima
- Global rotation equivalence of phase configurations
- Nonnegativity and synchronized global minima
- Analytic local minima and Lyapunov stability
- Spurious minima obstruct global synchrony
- Strict saddle critical point
- Complete-graph positive-semidefinite equilibria
- Connections to optimization and transformer dynamics
- Real and complex equilibrium identities
- Second-order necessary conditions for stable states
- Asymptotically global synchrony via basin mass
- Pointwise comparisons used in kernel stability
- Kernel stability condition — Lemma 2.8
- Kernel bounds on three phase regions
- Almost antisymmetry and summed kernel bounds
- Mass amplification outline and methodological claims
- Single-point convergence for analytic gradient flows
- Measure-zero convergence to strict saddles
- Positive-semidefinite-equilibrium criterion for global synchrony
- Synchronization landscape preserved by vertex gluing
- Two cliques joined by one edge synchronize despite poor expansion
- Trees synchronize whereas cycles longer than five do not
- Destroying cycle spurious minima by bounded-degree edge additions
- Historical regular-graph synchronization question and subsequent negative-resolution claims
- Critical PSD phases: quadratic tests and small-alpha mass bound
- Regular critical PSD phases: a direct mass bootstrap at 0.0816
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 3, equation (1.2); PDF p. 10, opening of Section 2