Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonnegativity and synchronized global minima

PDF p. 3: Section 1, paragraph before Definition 1.1

Statement

Assume countable choice. Let G=(V,E) be a finite undirected graph with nonempty vertex set, allowing self-loops, and let A be its symmetric binary adjacency matrix. For a phase state θ∈TV=(S1)V=RV/(2πZ)V, its homogeneous Kuramoto energy is EG(θ)=12∑x,y∈VAx,y(1−cos⁡(θx−θy)), evaluated using any real lift. Then EG(θ)≥0 for every phase state. Every fully synchronized state, meaning one with θx=θy in S1 for all x,y∈V, has energy zero and is a global minimizer: its energy is no greater than that of any phase state.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Countable choice is assumed, as in the synchronized-state definition (The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω), Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima).

[F1]

The graph has finitely many vertices and each adjacency entry Ax,y is either zero or one (Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation).

[F2]

Phase states are equivalence classes of real vectors modulo coordinatewise integer multiples of 2π; the energy formula is independent of the chosen lift (Finite phase tori, local lifts and the flat metric, Homogeneous Kuramoto energy).

[F3]

For real u,v, the phasor z(u)=eiu has modulus one, z(u−v)=z(u)z(v)‾, and cos⁡(u−v)=Re⁡z(u−v); these values are unchanged by adding integer multiples of 2π to either angle (Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives).

[F4]

A fully synchronized state has equal phase coordinates in S1 (Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima).

Proof

Given: A graph and phase state as in the statement, and a real lift of that state.

Goal: Prove nonnegativity of its energy and zero energy, hence global minimality, for each fully synchronized state.

1.1F1F2F3algebra

For any real t, write z(t)=a+ib with real a,b. By [F3], a2+b2=∣z(t)∣2=1, so a≤1 and hence 1−cos⁡t≥0. Each adjacency coefficient is nonnegative by [F1]. Therefore every term in the finite ordered-pair energy sum is nonnegative, and EG(θ)≥0. The value is independent of the lift by [F2].

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

If the state is fully synchronized, [F4] and [F2] imply that any two lifted coordinates differ by an integer multiple of 2π. By the periodicity in [F3], their phasors are equal; hence z(θx−θy)=z(θx)z(θy)‾=∣z(θx)∣2=1. Thus every cosine in the energy sum equals one and the energy is zero. Step 1.1 shows that no phase state has smaller energy, so every fully synchronized state is a global minimizer.

Source notes

The claim is attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF page 3, Section 1, paragraph before Definition 1.1. The proof above is a local argument from the listed mathematical suppliers.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources