How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Real and complex equilibrium identities
PDF p. 10: Equations (2.3), (2.4)
Statement
Assume countable choice. Let be a finite undirected graph with nonempty vertex set, possibly with self-loops, and let be its symmetric adjacency matrix. Let be a phase state, with real representatives used in the formulas. The homogeneous Kuramoto energy is . An equilibrium is a critical point of this energy, equivalently a zero of the homogeneous system's rotating-frame vector field.
The following conditions are equivalent:
- is an equilibrium.
- For every , .
- For every there is a real number such that .
In condition 3 one may take . The coefficients are real but are not asserted to be nonnegative.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The adjacency matrix of the finite undirected graph is real and symmetric (Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation).
A phase state has real representatives differing coordinatewise by integer multiples of ; the stated energy is well defined on the phase torus (Finite phase tori, local lifts and the flat metric, Homogeneous Kuramoto energy).
Under countable choice, an equilibrium is exactly a critical point of the energy, meaning that its gradient vanishes (The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω), Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima).
The component of the energy gradient is (Gradient and Hessian formulas).
For real , and . These expressions are unchanged by changing phase representatives by multiples of ; real and imaginary parts distribute over finite sums (Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives).
Proof
Given: A graph and phase state as in the Statement, under countable choice.
Goal: Prove the equivalence of the three conditions and the displayed formula for .
By [F3] and [F4], equilibrium is equivalent to the vanishing, for every , of . By symmetry of and the phasor identities in [F5], ; hence this sum is the negative of . Thus conditions 1 and 2 are equivalent.
Fix and set . By [F5] and the reality of , . Since , the equation for a real holds exactly when the imaginary part of this product vanishes; then is its real part. This proves the equivalence of conditions 2 and 3 and the formula for . The formulas are independent of representatives by [F2] and [F5]. Together with step 1.1, this completes the proof.
Source notes
Equations (2.3) and (2.4) and their equivalence are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF page 10. The argument above derives the identities from the stated mathematical inputs.
Depends on
- Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation
- Finite phase tori, local lifts and the flat metric
- Homogeneous Kuramoto energy
- Graph Kuramoto differential equations
- Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima
- Gradient and Hessian formulas
- Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 10, equations (2.3) and (2.4)