Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complete-graph positive-semidefinite equilibria

PDF p. 7: Remark 1.7 continuation; PDF p. 8: Remark 1.7 continuation

Statement

Let Kn be the unweighted graph on n≥1 vertices with one edge between each pair of distinct vertices, and let θ∈(R/2πZ)n. Its energy is EKn(θ)=∑1≤x<y≤n(1−cos⁡(θx−θy)). An equilibrium is a state with ∇EKn(θ)=0 in angular coordinates. Its Hessian is positive semidefinite, written ∇2EKn(θ)⪰0, when its real quadratic form is nonnegative on every real vector. Fully synchronized means that all phases agree modulo 2π.

Every equilibrium of Kn with positive-semidefinite energy Hessian is fully synchronized. The equilibrium hypothesis is necessary: positive semidefiniteness alone does not imply synchronization.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

For the complete graph, the ordered-pair energy in the energy definition equals the sum over unordered distinct pairs displayed above, since the adjacency matrix is symmetric and the diagonal contributions vanish (Homogeneous Kuramoto energy).

[F2]

For this unordered-pair energy, every equilibrium whose Hessian is positive semidefinite is fully synchronized (A complete-graph second-order landscape application).

[F3]

The Hessian quadratic form for a cosine-difference pair potential is the sum over unordered edges of cos⁡(θx−θy)(vx−vy)2; the derivatives of sine and cosine have their usual values (Differentiation of symmetric periodic pair potentials, Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives).

[F4]

Positive semidefiniteness means nonnegativity of the quadratic form on real vectors; a real symmetric Hessian satisfying this condition also satisfies the stated Hermitian convention (Loewner order, Hermitian inner product, and operator norm, Real symmetric quadratic forms tested on phasors).

Proof

Given: A phase state on Kn with vanishing energy gradient and positive-semidefinite Hessian.

Goal: Establish synchronization and show that the stationarity hypothesis cannot be omitted.

1.1givenF1F2

By [F1], the energy and angular derivatives are those in [F2]. The given gradient and Hessian hypotheses therefore meet that result's hypotheses, so all phases agree modulo 2π.

2.1F3F4choosealgebra∎

For the necessity of stationarity, take K2 and phases θ1=0, θ2=π/3. By [F3], the Hessian quadratic form is 12(v1−v2)2≥0 for every real vector v, hence the Hessian is positive semidefinite by [F4]. The phases are distinct modulo 2π; the gradient is nonzero because its first component is sin⁡(−π/3)≠0. Thus this state is not synchronized and is not an equilibrium.

Source notes

Remark 1.7 of Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF pp. 7–8, states the configuration-level claim without the equilibrium hypothesis. The counterexample above addresses that wording; the equilibrium result follows from the local supplier cited in [F2].

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources