Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A complete-graph second-order landscape application

Statement

Let V be a finite set of n≥1 vertices. The unweighted complete graph has one edge between each pair of distinct vertices. A phase configuration is θ∈TV=RV/(2πZ)V; write θx also for an angular representative. Its cosine-difference energy is U(θ)=∑{x,y}⊆V, x≠y(1−cos⁡(θx−θy)). An equilibrium means a configuration at which the gradient of U in angular coordinates vanishes. Its Hessian H is the matrix of second angular partial derivatives; it is positive semidefinite if fTHf≥0 for every f∈RV. Fully synchronized means that all phases coincide modulo 2π.

Every equilibrium of this energy whose Hessian is positive semidefinite is fully synchronized. Common rotation means adding the same phase to every coordinate; the conclusion is invariant under this rotation. No general converse from a positive semidefinite Hessian to local minimality is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Angular representatives differ by integer multiples of 2π, and angular chart transitions are translations. Thus the displayed gradient and Hessian conditions are independent of the chosen angular chart (Finite phase tori, local lifts and the flat metric).

[F2]

For real u,v, eiu=cos⁡u+isin⁡u has modulus one, ei(u−v)=eiueiv‾, and these expressions are unchanged by adding integer multiples of 2π to angles. The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, respectively (Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives).

[F3]

For a symmetric array of real weights and an even twice continuously differentiable periodic pair potential, the gradient is the sum of its first derivatives over neighbors and the Hessian quadratic form is one half the ordered sum of the second derivative times the squared coordinate difference (Differentiation of symmetric periodic pair potentials).

[F4]

For a real symmetric matrix, positive semidefiniteness on real vectors implies nonnegativity of its complex quadratic form. For a real symmetric array b, the complex form of diag⁡(∑ybxy)−b equals 12∑x,ybxy∣fx−fy∣2 (Real symmetric quadratic forms tested on phasors).

[F5]

A nonzero average of unit phasors can be rotated to its positive modulus by multiplying all phasors by a common unit phasor (Rigidity and rotation of a unit-phasor average).

Proof

Given: A configuration θ on the complete graph with vanishing angular gradient and positive semidefinite Hessian H.

Goal: Show that all its phases coincide modulo 2π.

1.1F2F3F4algebra

Set zx=eiθx and R=∑xzx. Apply [F3] with wxy=1 for x≠y, wxx=0, and v(t)=1−cos⁡t. By [F2], the gradient component is ∑ysin⁡(θx−θy)=Im⁡(zxR‾), and the real Hessian is the weighted Laplacian with entries bxy=cos⁡(θx−θy) for x≠y and bxx=0. Adding the harmless diagonal coefficients bxx=1 leaves this Laplacian unchanged. Since bxy=12(zxzy‾+zx‾zy), finite-sum expansion gives ∑x,yfx‾bxyfy=12(∣∑xzxfx∣2+∣∑xzx‾fx∣2). Expanding the complex quadratic form from [F4] therefore gives, for every f∈CV, f∗Hf=∑xRe⁡(zxR‾)∣fx∣2−12(∣∑xzxfx∣2+∣∑xzx‾fx∣2).

2.1givenF2F4step 1.1choosealgebra

If R=0, choose fx=zx‾. By [F2], ∑xzxfx=n and ∑xzx‾fx=∑xzx2‾. Step 1.1 gives f∗Hf=−12(n2+∣∑xzx2∣2)≤−12n2<0, contradicting [F4] and the assumed positive semidefiniteness. Hence R≠0.

3.1givenF2F5step 1.1step 2.1choosealgebra

Put r=∣R∣>0. By [F5], a common rotation makes R=r; it leaves phase differences, the gradient equations and H unchanged. At equilibrium, step 1.1 then gives Im⁡zx=0 for every x. Since ∣zx∣=1, each zx is either 1 or −1. If some zx=−1, choose the real coordinate vector f that is 1 at x and zero elsewhere. Step 1.1 gives fTHf=−r−1<0, contradicting positive semidefiniteness. Thus every rotated phasor equals 1.

4.1F1F2step 3.1∎

Therefore the original phasors are all equal. The phase-torus identification with the unit circle in [F1], together with [F2], implies that their phases agree modulo 2π. This is full synchronization. The proof used only the stated equilibrium and Hessian hypotheses and makes no sufficiency claim for general semidefinite Hessians.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.