How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Parameter and critical-step estimates in general amplification
PDF p. 26: Proof of Theorem 1.10, numerical consequences and critical step; PDF p. 27: Proof of Theorem 1.10, numerical consequences and critical step
Statement
Use the graph, state, parameters and small-stage construction of Two-stage angle and mass construction. In particular, , , , , , , , , and . The logarithm is natural. Let , where is the phase tail defined in the construction, and let be its constructed small-stage mass bounds. Then , , and .
Let be the first small-stage index at which either or both and . Then exists and . The ceiling is the least integer at least its argument.
Facts & Assumptions
Under the stated hypotheses, the construction has , and . Before its small-stage cap is reached, its mass bounds satisfy ; the construction continues until that cap or index (Two-stage angle and mass construction).
For , , and for , (Elementary angle and logarithm estimates used in amplification).
The ceiling exists, and for the logarithm and geometric growth give whenever (Geometric growth, truncation and total decrement budgets).
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and construction in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the numerical estimates, existence of and its stated upper bounds.
Set . Thus . By [F1], , so the assumed inequality implies because . Consequently and . The bound on is also in [F1].
Put . Since , [F3] gives . If the small-stage cap is reached at or before , the first stopping alternative holds. Otherwise [F1] gives , so the second alternative holds at . Hence a first such index exists and . This also covers a cap already reached at index zero.
Write . If , then . If , [F2] gives . In either case . Also [F2] gives . Using , the latter ratio equals . Combining these inequalities with step 1.2 proves the claimed bounds.
The numerical consequences and critical-step estimate are attributed to the proof of Theorem 1.10 in Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF pp. 26–27. The argument above uses the declared suppliers.
Source attribution
The numerical consequences and critical-step estimate are attributed to the proof of Theorem 1.10 in Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF pp. 26–27. The argument above uses the declared suppliers.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF pp. 26–27, proof of Theorem 1.10