How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two-stage angle and mass construction
PDF p. 26: Proof of Theorem 1.10, two cases; PDF p. 27: Proof of Theorem 1.10, two cases
Definition
Assume countable choice. Take a finite connected -expander and a stable, nonsynchronized phase state whose first order parameter is real and nonnegative, as in Angle and mass sequences in the amplification argument and Two-sided spectral expander — Definition 1.9. Thus a stable state is a local minimum of the graph energy, and its first order parameter is the mean of its unit phase vectors. For principal representatives , put for ; this is the phase tail at angle (Phase tail sets for amplification).
Assume , , and . Put , , , , , and . Here is the natural logarithm. Assume the article's condition (1.3): . The positive and nonzero gap make the displayed formulas meaningful.
Set and . Let , the least integer at least . Starting at , use the following small-stage update while and : and . Let be the index at which this stage stops. If , stop with . Otherwise repeatedly use the large-stage update and until . The inverse sine is its principal real branch. The output is the finite sequence .
Facts & Assumptions
The sequence definition gives under the stated graph, normalization, stability, nonsynchronization and countable-choice assumptions. The phase tails are nested as their angle decreases (Angle and mass sequences in the amplification argument, Phase tail sets for amplification, The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)).
For , the small-set amplification lemma with gives if . The large-set lemma gives if and (Small-set amplification — Lemma 4.2, Large-set amplification — Lemma 4.3).
For , ; for , , strictly for (Angular order and elementary inverse-trigonometric bounds).
A sequence growing at least by a factor until a positive cap is reached reaches that cap in finitely many steps. On a geometric stage, decrements bounded by sum to at most (Geometric growth, truncation and total decrement budgets). Every real number has an integer part, so the stated ceiling exists (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m ≤ x < m + 1).
The principal inverse sine satisfies for (Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine). Sine is strictly increasing on and (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi). Together with the nonnegative principal range in [F3], these facts give for .
For real , , and ; hence (Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).
The natural logarithm is strictly increasing on , satisfies and for , and obeys (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm, The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).
A property holding at zero and preserved by the successor step holds for every nonnegative integer (The principle of mathematical induction). Here for a nonnegative integer denotes the product of copies of , with .
Justification
Given: The graph, state and parameters in the definition.
Goal: Show that every executed update is defined, its claimed mass is a tail lower bound, and the procedure stops with a positive final angle. Moreover, show .
1.1 Since and , . More sharply, because and . By logarithm monotonicity in [F7] and the strict bound in [F3] at , . Also . Condition (1.3) therefore implies . In particular , and , so by [F7]. [given, F3, F7, algebra]
2.1 Let . The ceiling satisfies : if then , and otherwise for . By [F3], . Thus . The total decrement of at most small updates is at most , using [F3], step 1.1 and (1.3). [F3, F4, step 1.1, algebra]
3.1 Verify the updates inductively, as long as they are executed. The small-stage angle remains positive by step 2.1, and its decrement is the positive principal inverse sine of . By [F5], . Hence [F2] applies, since , , and . It gives . Before the cap, , so until the cap is reached. If the small stage stops without the cap, it has . The product law in [F7] and induction [F8] give for every nonnegative integer : the case uses , and multiplying by adds . Thus , so strict logarithm monotonicity and the inverse identity in [F7] give . If the cap is reached, the procedure stops. [F1, F2, F4, F5, F7, F8, step 2.1, induction, algebra]
4.1 In the remaining case, . Before the large-stage cap, induction using [F2] gives . Consequently each inverse-sine argument is positive and at most . By [F5], each decrement is positive and its sine equals , as required by [F2]. Also [F3] bounds the total large-stage decrement by . The last inequality follows from , , and (1.3). This bound applies to every finite prefix, so the next angle remains positive and the induction is valid at every update. The growth-and-cap assertion in [F4] makes the large stage finite, with . [F2, F3, F4, F5, F8, step 1.1, step 3.1, induction, algebra]
5.1 The constructed angles strictly decrease and all remain positive. In the small-stage stopping case, step 2.1 gives and . By [F5] and [F6], sine is nonnegative and strictly increasing on , with , so . Since , this gives . In the large-stage case, steps 2.1 and 4.1 give and , so . The mass bounds and strict growth before the relevant cap make the output an amplification sequence. [F1, F3, F5, F6, step 2.1, step 3.1, step 4.1, algebra] ∎
The two update formulas and two-stage stopping construction are attributed to the proof of Theorem 1.10 in Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF pp. 26–28. The local justification uses the declared mathematical suppliers.
Source notes
The two update formulas and two-stage stopping construction are attributed to the proof of Theorem 1.10 in Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF pp. 26–28. The local justification uses the declared mathematical suppliers.
Depends on
- Angle and mass sequences in the amplification argument
- Phase tail sets for amplification
- Two-sided spectral expander — Definition 1.9
- Small-set amplification — Lemma 4.2
- Large-set amplification — Lemma 4.3
- Geometric growth, truncation and total decrement budgets
- Angular order and elementary inverse-trigonometric bounds
- Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m ≤ x < m + 1
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
- Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine
- Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine
- The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi
- Double-angle and quadratic power-reduction identities
- Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- The principle of mathematical induction
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF pp. 26–28, proof of Theorem 1.10