How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two-sided spectral expander — Definition 1.9
PDF p. 8: Definition 1.9
Definition
Let be a finite undirected graph with , adjacency matrix , degree matrix , and Laplacian , using the graph conventions of Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation. Thus , including a diagonal loop entry once. Let be the identity matrix and the all-ones matrix. For real parameters , , , and , put and .
The graph is an -expander if it is an -expander, meaning that , and also satisfies . Here is the operator norm induced by the standard norm on . For Hermitian matrices, means that for every . The definition does not require to be regular.
Justification
The graph convention supplies real symmetric matrices , , and of the same size (Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation). Because , the centered-matrix construction gives well-defined real symmetric matrices and (Centered graph matrices and reference degree). The operator norm and Loewner order are well defined for these matrices (Loewner order, Hermitian inner product, and operator norm). The first inequality is precisely the previously defined -expander predicate (Adjacency spectral expander — Definition 1.3), while the two order inequalities are meaningful predicates on the same vertex space. Their conjunction therefore defines the stated class. No sign restrictions on the real parameters are needed to make this predicate meaningful; the inequalities themselves determine whether a given graph belongs to the class.
Source notes
The formulation is attributed to Definition 1.9 of Expander graphs are globally synchronizing. The justification above uses the displayed definitions and does not treat the article as proof of its own definition.
Depends on
Used by · 34
- Regular adjacency expansion supplies two-sided expansion
- Degree bounds from two-sided expansion — Lemma 3.1
- Degree control implies two-sided expansion — Proposition 3.2
- Connectivity and the lower Laplacian parameter
- Disjoint-set lower mixing needs additional hypotheses
- Cut-edge mixing bound — Lemma 3.4
- Total incident edge bounds — Lemma 3.6
- Mixing for two nearby nested sets — Lemma 3.7
- Relative mixing for a small nested set — Lemma 3.8
- Chernoff degree concentration used in Section 6
- Failure of the stated constant-two expansion bound — Corollary 6.1
- Cheeger lower bound — Remark 3.5
- Strict forms of the nested mixing estimates — Remark 3.9
- Almost antisymmetry and summed kernel bounds
- Small-set amplification — Lemma 4.2
- Large-set amplification — Lemma 4.3
- Two-stage angle and mass construction
- Valid restricted spectral tails and a counterexample to the shifted degree-failure conclusion
- Quantitative two-sided expansion — Proposition 6.9
- General two-sided spectral criterion — Theorem 1.10
- Erdős–Rényi global synchronization — Theorem 1.2
- Synchronization for sufficiently large logarithmic density constants
- Quantitative Erdős–Rényi synchrony and the false exact-expansion rate — Theorem 6.2
- The original shifted roots impose a minimum degree above log n
- Two fixed-parameter expander events have vanishing success probabilities
- Critical PSD phases: quadratic tests and small-alpha mass bound
- Kernel phases on two-sided expanders: the two tail-growth estimates
- Positive-reference expanders have only synchronized critical PSD phases
- Critical PSD kernel phases: quantitative tail growth
- Certified regular amplification excludes a PSD half-circle tail
- The unshifted lower Laplacian bound excludes a boundary degree
- The exact unshifted expansion event cannot have polynomial failure decay
- Slack entropy thresholds preserve the quantitative synchronization bound
- Uniform two-sided expansion sufficient for global synchrony
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF page 8, Definition 1.9