Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cheeger lower bound — Remark 3.5

PDF p. 20: Remark 3.5

Statement

Let G=(V,E) be an (n,d∗,α,c−,c+)-expander with n≥2. Its unnormalized edge isoperimetric constant, also called its Cheeger constant, is h(G)=min⁡0<∣X∣≤n/2e(X,Xc)/∣X∣, where X⊆V, Xc=V∖X, and e(X,Xc) counts each edge crossing the cut once. Then

h(G)≥(1+c−)d∗2.

Here G is called connected when the graph on V obtained by deleting all self-loops is connected, meaning that every two vertices are joined by a path.

If d∗>0 and c−>−1, then G is connected. Conversely, a connected graph admits a choice of expander parameters with c−>−1, but connectivity does not force every admissible prescribed lower parameter to exceed −1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

For every X⊆V, the cut estimate gives e(X,Xc)≥(1+c−)(d∗/n)∣X∣∣Xc∣ (Cut-edge mixing bound — Lemma 3.4).

[F2]

The cut count is nonnegative, and for n≥2 the Cheeger constant is the minimum of the displayed quotients over the nonempty family of admissible subsets (Oriented edge count between sets, Edge isoperimetric constant convention).

[F3]

For an expander with n≥2 and a positive reference parameter, c−>−1 implies connectivity. Conversely, if such an expander is connected, it admits a choice of expander parameters whose lower parameter exceeds −1. An arbitrary prescribed admissible lower parameter need not exceed −1, as shown by the K2 example. Connectivity and the lower Laplacian parameter

[F4]

Connectedness in the loop-free graph means that every two vertices are joined by a path; this is the connectedness convention used for G after deleting its self-loops. Connected graphs and connected components defined by the existence of vertex paths

[F5]

For every finite real symmetric matrix B, its induced operator norm is finite and nonnegative, and −∥B∥I⪯B⪯∥B∥I. Self-adjoint order, norm bounds and diagonal tests

Proof

Given: An expander G with n≥2, and, for the connectivity implication, d∗>0.

Goal: Prove the Cheeger lower bound and the qualified connectivity statements.

1.1F1F2algebra

Put t=(1+c−)d∗. If t≥0, take any admissible X. Since ∣Xc∣/n=1−∣X∣/n≥1/2, [F1] gives e(X,Xc)/∣X∣≥t∣Xc∣/n≥t/2. Taking the minimum using [F2] yields h(G)≥t/2.

1.2givenF3F4

If the given representation has d∗>0 and c−>−1, the positive-reference implication of [F3] gives connectivity in the convention of [F4].

1.3givenF4F5choosealgebra

Conversely, suppose G is connected. In the notation of the expander definition, A and L are finite real symmetric matrices, as are I and J. Choose d~∗=1, put α0=∥A−J/n∥ and b=∥L−I+J/n∥, and set c0−=−b, c0+=b. These are finite real parameters by [F5]. The adjacency norm inequality holds with equality, and [F5] gives −bI⪯L−I+J/n⪯bI. Thus G is an (n,1,α0,c0−,c0+)-expander with positive reference parameter, independently of its original d∗ (Two-sided spectral expander — Definition 1.9).

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

If t<0, every admissible quotient is nonnegative by [F2], so h(G)≥0>t/2. Together with step 1.1 this proves the bound without an additional sign assumption on t.

3.1F3F4step 1.3∎

Apply the converse in [F3] to the connected positive-reference expander constructed in step 1.3. All its stated hypotheses now hold, so it provides a choice of expander parameters with lower parameter greater than −1, as claimed. The K2 example in [F3] supplies the limitation for arbitrary prescribed lower parameters.

Source notes

Remark 3.5 of Expander graphs are globally synchronizing states the Cheeger bound and describes c−>−1 as equivalent to connectivity. The qualification above accounts for nonoptimal admissible lower parameters; the cited article supplies attribution, not the proof.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources