How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Degree control implies two-sided expansion — Proposition 3.2
PDF p. 18: Proposition 3.2; PDF p. 19: Proposition 3.2 and proof
Statement
Let be a finite undirected graph with , allowing self-loops and counting a loop once in the degree. Let be its adjacency matrix, its diagonal degree matrix, , the identity, and the all-ones matrix. For real parameters put and . Write and for the minimum and maximum vertex degrees, and use the induced operator norm and Loewner order on the complex vertex space.
If and , then is an -expander: it satisfies the stated norm bound and .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The degree matrix is diagonal with entries , and for every vertex. The adjacency matrix is real symmetric (Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation).
The centered matrices are real symmetric and obey (Centered graph matrices and reference degree).
For real symmetric and , implies ; Loewner inequalities can be added (Self-adjoint order, norm bounds and diagonal tests). The order is defined by nonnegative quadratic forms (Loewner order, Hermitian inner product, and operator norm).
A graph is an -expander exactly when and (Two-sided spectral expander — Definition 1.9).
Proof
Given: The graph, real parameters, norm bound and degree bounds in the statement.
Goal: Establish both defining inequalities of the two-sided expander.
Put . The operator norm is nonnegative, so the given bound implies . By [F1] and the given degree bounds, every diagonal entry of and of is nonnegative. Their quadratic forms are sums of these entries times , so the definition of order in [F3] gives .
By [F2], is real symmetric. The norm bound and [F3] therefore give . Adding these inequalities to the two bounds in step 1.1 yields . Subtracting throughout and using [F2] gives . Together with the given norm bound, [F4] proves the asserted expander property.
Source notes
Proposition 3.2 and its degree-to-order argument are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF pp. 18–19. The proof above derives the claim from the stated suppliers.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF pp. 18–19, Proposition 3.2 and proof