Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Degree control implies two-sided expansion — Proposition 3.2

PDF p. 18: Proposition 3.2; PDF p. 19: Proposition 3.2 and proof

Statement

Let G=(V,E) be a finite undirected graph with n=∣V∣>0, allowing self-loops and counting a loop once in the degree. Let A be its adjacency matrix, D its diagonal degree matrix, L=D−A, I the identity, and J the all-ones matrix. For real parameters d∗,α,c−,c+ put ΔA=A−(d∗/n)J and ΔL=L−d∗I+(d∗/n)J. Write dmin⁡(G) and dmax⁡(G) for the minimum and maximum vertex degrees, and use the induced operator norm and Loewner order on the complex vertex space.

If ∥ΔA∥≤αd∗ and (1+c−+α)d∗≤dmin⁡(G)≤dmax⁡(G)≤(1+c+−α)d∗, then G is an (n,d∗,α,c−,c+)-expander: it satisfies the stated norm bound and c−d∗I⪯ΔL⪯c+d∗I.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The degree matrix is diagonal with entries Dxx=d(x), and dmin⁡(G)≤d(x)≤dmax⁡(G) for every vertex. The adjacency matrix is real symmetric (Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation).

[F2]

The centered matrices are real symmetric and obey ΔL=(D−d∗I)−ΔA (Centered graph matrices and reference degree).

[F3]

For real symmetric B and b≥0, ∥B∥≤b implies −bI⪯B⪯bI; Loewner inequalities can be added (Self-adjoint order, norm bounds and diagonal tests). The order is defined by nonnegative quadratic forms (Loewner order, Hermitian inner product, and operator norm).

[F4]

A graph is an (n,d∗,α,c−,c+)-expander exactly when ∥ΔA∥≤αd∗ and c−d∗I⪯ΔL⪯c+d∗I (Two-sided spectral expander — Definition 1.9).

Proof

Given: The graph, real parameters, norm bound and degree bounds in the statement.

Goal: Establish both defining inequalities of the two-sided expander.

1.1givenF1F3algebra

Put b=αd∗. The operator norm is nonnegative, so the given bound implies b≥0. By [F1] and the given degree bounds, every diagonal entry of D−((1+c−)d∗+b)I and of ((1+c+)d∗−b)I−D is nonnegative. Their quadratic forms are sums of these entries times ∣f(x)∣2, so the definition of order in [F3] gives ((1+c−)d∗+b)I⪯D⪯((1+c+)d∗−b)I.

2.1givenF2F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

By [F2], ΔA is real symmetric. The norm bound and [F3] therefore give −bI⪯ΔA⪯bI. Adding these inequalities to the two bounds in step 1.1 yields (1+c−)d∗I⪯D−d∗I−ΔA+d∗I⪯(1+c+)d∗I. Subtracting d∗I throughout and using [F2] gives c−d∗I⪯ΔL⪯c+d∗I. Together with the given norm bound, [F4] proves the asserted expander property.

Source notes

Proposition 3.2 and its degree-to-order argument are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF pp. 18–19. The proof above derives the claim from the stated suppliers.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources