How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Centered graph matrices and reference degree
PDF p. 6: Section 1.2
Definition
Let be a finite undirected graph with , adjacency matrix , degree matrix , and graph Laplacian , using the conventions of Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation. Thus and a self-loop contributes once to this sum. Let be the identity matrix and the all-ones matrix. For a real reference parameter , define the centered adjacency matrix , the centered diagonal degree matrix , and the centered Laplacian matrix .
The article describes its intended selection of as an “expected average degree” of . The article chooses when is -regular, meaning every vertex has degree . For the Erdős–Rényi graph , whose distinct possible edges occur independently with probability and which has no loops, it chooses (Erdős–Rényi random graph and high probability). This is the reference parameter; under that loop-free convention the exact expected degree is .
Facts & Assumptions
The graph notation supplies the matrices of the same size and the identity (Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation).
For nonempty , is the orthogonal projection onto the constant vectors in (The constant projection and centering decomposition).
In the possible edges incident to a fixed vertex have Bernoulli probability (Erdős–Rényi random graph and high probability).
For a real random variable on a finite probability space , expectation is the weighted sum (Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space).
For a finite family of real random variables on one finite probability space, , without any independence hypothesis; for the empty family both sides are zero (Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis).
Justification
Given: The graph and real reference parameter in the definition, and the stated random-graph law when the random example is considered.
Goal: Verify that the centered matrices and their displayed identity are well defined, and clarify the reference choices.
1.1 Since , the scalar exists. The matrices in [F1] have matching dimensions, so the three displayed sums and differences define matrices uniquely. Substituting gives . By [F2], the term is times the projection onto constant vectors. [given, F1, F2, algebra]
1.2 For the random example, take the finite probability space of simple graphs on with the law in [F3]. For distinct vertices , let be the indicator of the edge . Since it is on the edge-present event and elsewhere, [F4] gives by [F3]. [given, F3, F4, algebra]
2.1 For a -regular graph the common degree specifies the stated reference value. For , the degree of a fixed vertex is by [F1] and the absence of loops. These are real indicators on the same finite probability space, so [F5] and step 1.2 give , including the empty sum when . Thus is the stated reference choice, not an assertion that this exact expectation equals . Both reference choices are valid real parameters in the preceding construction. [given, F1, F3, F5, step 1.1, step 1.2, algebra] ∎
Source notes
The notation and the two reference choices are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, Section 1.2. The justification uses the stated suppliers and elementary calculation.
Depends on
- Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation
- Erdős–Rényi random graph and high probability
- The constant projection and centering decomposition
- Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space
- Expectation is linear for every finite family of random variables, without any independence hypothesis
Used by · 31
- Adjacency spectral expander — Definition 1.3
- Two-sided spectral expander — Definition 1.9
- Regular adjacency expansion supplies two-sided expansion
- Degree control implies two-sided expansion — Proposition 3.2
- Connectivity and the lower Laplacian parameter
- Cut test-vector identities for Laplacian mixing
- Failure of symmetric Laplacian control near threshold
- Symmetry and moments in the random-matrix discussion
- Symmetrization and moments of the adjacency difference
- The reported centered-adjacency estimate and its sparse-law limit
- Expected-norm estimate from the corrected moment comparison
- Expected centered-adjacency norm — Proposition 6.3
- Numerical coefficients and thresholds — Remark 6.4
- Convex adjacency norm: sharp coordinate constant and median counterexample
- Counterexamples to both centered-adjacency tail bounds in Corollary 6.6
- Spectral estimates for phase Fourier sums
- Centered-adjacency pointwise phase bounds
- Order parameter control of total H mass — Lemma 2.3
- Refined order estimates for regular graphs — Remark 2.7
- Synchronization for sufficiently large logarithmic density constants
- Loop-free Bernoulli adjacency and its two centerings
- A near-threshold counterexample to the reported constant-two spectral bound
- A high-degree vertex forces a large centered adjacency norm
- A centered adjacency column retains a high-degree lower bound
- Normalize the logarithmic random graph for nonbacktracking estimates
- Mean-zero projection of the regular phase vector
- Refined H mass bound in a regular graph
- Rational bootstrap through the regular endpoint
- Both tractable inequalities at the regular endpoint
- Small-alpha first parameter and regular H mass
- Uniform centered normalization across the full Bernoulli density range
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 6, Section 1.2