Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Numerical coefficients and thresholds — Remark 6.4

PDF p. 34: Remark 6.4

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For α>0 and x≥3, define f(α,x)=22e1/(2α)(1+2αlog⁡x/x), with natural logarithm and positive square roots. Then f(2,4)<7.91, f(3,120)<4.98, f(5,880)<3.994, and f(25,450000)<2.996. For each fixed α, the function decreases in x≥3.

The article proposes the thresholds n0(8)=4, n0(5)=120, n0(4)=880, and n0(3)=450000 for Proposition 6.3. That proposition asserts that, for every C>22, the estimate E∥ΔA∥≤Cnp(1−p) holds for all n≥n0(C) and every p∈(0,1). The uniform assertion fails for each of these constants at arbitrarily large n. Here G(n,p) is the loop-free random graph with independent edges of probability p, A is its adjacency matrix, J is the all-ones matrix, ΔA=A−pJ, and the norm is the Euclidean operator norm.

The article also states that the lost factor 2 is inevitable if symmetrization is used. For independent Bernoulli-p variables X,X′, the difference X−X′ has variance 2p(1−p), twice the variance of X−p. Thus a factor 2 occurs at the standard-deviation level in this independent-copy operation when 0<p<1. This calculation does not establish the broader inevitability claim for every symmetrization or norm estimate.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Under Choice, the corrected moment estimate defines the displayed f and proves its strict decrease for x≥3. Its moment argument requires an integer moment parameter (Expected-norm estimate from the corrected moment comparison, The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

For the stated loop-free graph and centering, Proposition 6.3's original uniform-in-p assertion fails for arbitrarily large n. The graph has zero adjacency diagonal, and the operator norm is the supremum of ∥ΔAv∥2 over Euclidean unit vectors v (Expected centered-adjacency norm — Proposition 6.3, Erdős–Rényi random graph and high probability, Centered graph matrices and reference degree, Loewner order, Hermitian inner product, and operator norm).

[F3]

For ∣u∣≤1/2, the exponential series through degree 12 has absolute remainder at most ∣u∣13/(13!(1−∣u∣/14)). For 1≤y≤2, the logarithm series through index 10, with v=(y−1)/(y+1), has absolute remainder at most 2∣v∣23/(23(1−v2)); also log⁡(2jy)=jlog⁡2+log⁡y. Rational interval operations preserve enclosure (Range-reduced exponential, logarithm and arctangent series have certified tails, Finite real interval operations enclose their exact values).

[F4]

Independent-copy norm symmetrization compares a matrix to an independent copy at its actual mean (Norm symmetrization at the actual matrix mean). Bernoulli-p variables take values 1 and 0 with probabilities p and 1−p (Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials). Independence makes the joint probabilities of two finite-valued copies products of their marginal probabilities (Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables). Variance is the expectation of the squared centered variable, and standard deviation is its nonnegative square root (Variance, standard deviation, and covariance on a finite probability space).

Proof

Given: The function and graph conventions in the Statement.

Goal: Certify the numerical comparisons, identify the status of the proposed thresholds, and calculate the independent-copy variance factor.

1.1F3givenalgebra

Apply [F3] with logarithm index 10, reducing each n as n=2jy with j=2,6,9,18 respectively and 1≤y<2. Exact rational evaluation of upper endpoints gives log⁡4<1.386295, log⁡120<4.787492, log⁡880<6.779922, and log⁡450000<13.017003. Applying the exponential enclosure with u=1/4,1/6,1/10,1/50 gives respective upper bounds 1.284026,1.181361,1.105171,1.020202. All displayed decimals in this step and the next are exact rationals.

1.2givenF1F2choosealgebra

For any of the four constants C and any integer n≥2, choose p=1−1/(16C2n). Then p∈(0,1) and p>1/2. By [F2], the diagonal of ΔA is −p, so applying it to a coordinate unit vector gives ∥ΔA∥≥p for every outcome. Consequently E∥ΔA∥>1/2, whereas Cnp(1−p)=p/4<1/4. The proposed uniform bound therefore fails at arbitrarily large n, independently of the proposed cutoff. The corrected moment estimate in [F1] does not supply the refuted uniform estimate.

2.1step 1.1F1F3algebra

Squaring positive rational endpoints and using step 1.1 gives respective upper bounds 1.177411,0.489260,0.277570,0.038031 for 2αlog⁡n/n at the four indicated pairs. Also 2<1.414214. Substitution into f, with outward rational arithmetic, gives upper bounds 7.907868,4.976206,3.993552,2.995309, respectively; each is strictly below the corresponding bound in the Statement. Monotonicity follows from [F1].

3.1F4algebra∎

By independence in [F4], P(X−X′=1)=P(X−X′=−1)=p(1−p), with the remaining probability at zero. Hence its mean is zero and its variance is 2p(1−p). The centered Bernoulli variable X−p has mean zero and variance p(1−p) by direct calculation. Taking square roots gives the stated standard-deviation ratio when 0<p<1; at p=0,1 both variances vanish.

Source notes

Remark 6.4 gives the four numerical comparisons and proposed cutoffs. The next paragraph states that the lost factor 2 is inevitable if symmetrization is used. The article citation provides attribution only. The counterexample concerns the original uniform expected-norm assertion under its stated centering, and the variance calculation describes the particular independent-copy operation.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources