How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Erdős–Rényi random graph and high probability
PDF p. 4: Section 1 random graph paragraph and footnote 4; PDF p. 30: Section 6, Erdős–Rényi random graph
Definition
For and , the Erdős–Rényi random graph is a random simple graph on the labelled vertex set . A simple graph has an edge set consisting of unordered pairs of distinct vertices, so it has neither loops nor repeated edges. For each of the possible pairs, the indicator of its presence is with probability and with probability ; these indicators are mutually independent, meaning that every finite joint assignment has probability equal to the product of its individual probabilities.
For a sequence , let be an event, meaning a set of possible graphs on , under the law of . The events hold with high probability if as : for every there is an such that whenever . The edge probability may therefore vary with .
Justification
The finite product of Bernoulli edge spaces gives exactly the stated independent indicators, including at and ; its outcomes correspond uniquely to simple graphs on . Thus the graph law is well defined by The Erdős-Rényi finite random graph G(n,p). The probability of an event is the sum of the weights of its graph outcomes. The high-probability convention is the ordinary limit of these event probabilities, even though the probability spaces vary with , as specified in Asymptotic quantifiers and uniform parameter ranges.
Source attribution
The article uses these conventions in Section 1 and Section 6. Its citation records attribution, not a proof of the definition.
Depends on
Used by · 29
- Centered graph matrices and reference degree
- Counts of vertices of each degree
- Chernoff degree concentration used in Section 6
- Classical Erdős–Rényi connectivity threshold
- Extremal-degree asymptotics near connectivity
- Independent-copy symmetrization matrix
- Symmetry and moments in the random-matrix discussion
- The reported centered-adjacency estimate and its sparse-law limit
- Failure of the stated constant-two expansion bound — Corollary 6.1
- Expected centered-adjacency norm — Proposition 6.3
- Numerical coefficients and thresholds — Remark 6.4
- Previous Erdős–Rényi synchronization bounds
- Mass amplification outline and methodological claims
- Quantitative two-sided expansion — Proposition 6.9
- Erdős–Rényi global synchronization — Theorem 1.2
- Synchronization for sufficiently large logarithmic density constants
- Quantitative Erdős–Rényi synchrony and the false exact-expansion rate — Theorem 6.2
- Critical-window gap and vanishing epsilon in the authors’ method
- Useful finite-size synchronization estimates near threshold
- Reported progress on benign landscapes and an alternative synchronization proof
- Loop-free Bernoulli adjacency and its two centerings
- A near-threshold counterexample to the reported constant-two spectral bound
- Uniform centered normalization across the full Bernoulli density range
- Uniform constant-two adjacency control above a large logarithmic density
- The unshifted lower Laplacian bound excludes a boundary degree
- The exact unshifted expansion event cannot have polynomial failure decay
- Slack entropy thresholds preserve the quantitative synchronization bound
- Uniform small centered adjacency above logarithmic mean degree
- Uniform two-sided expansion sufficient for global synchrony
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 4, Section 1 and footnote 4; PDF p. 30, Section 6