How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Previous Erdős–Rényi synchronization bounds
PDF p. 4: Section 1, previous work and amplification discussion; PDF p. 5: Section 1, previous work and amplification discussion
Statement
Assume countable choice. Let be the simple Erdős–Rényi graph, and consider identical unit-coupled Kuramoto oscillators on it. If and , then is globally synchronizing with high probability. The same conclusion holds if .
Here means that some constant satisfies for all sufficiently large . High probability means that the probability tends to one as . Global synchronization means that, outside a phase-volume-null set of initial states, the rotating-frame trajectory converges to a state in which all phases agree.
The article attributes the bound to Ling, Xu and Bandeira and the improvement to Kassabov, Strogatz and Townsend.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Under countable choice, for every fixed and every sequence satisfying eventually, the probability that the simple is globally synchronizing tends to one. This is the stated local consequence of the independent criterion and concentration inputs in Earlier thresholds with explicit source quantifiers and a fixed-scale deduction.
For every , (Logarithmic tangent bound and a quadratic entropy envelope). The logarithm laws give for (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
Proof
Given: Countable choice and a sequence satisfying either lower bound in the Statement.
Goal: Show that the probability of global synchronization tends to one.
If , then for some fixed and all sufficiently large we have . The conclusion follows from [F1].
Suppose instead that eventually, for some . For , [F2] gives . For sufficiently large , , so . Applying [F1] with the fixed positive constant proves the conclusion.
Source notes
The article's historical attributions are recorded from its Section 1. The argument above obtains both conclusions from the independently supplied squared-logarithmic result; it does not infer dynamical convergence from the separate local-minimum statement of Ling, Xu and Bandeira. The earlier-threshold supplier records the distinction between the published statement and its locally derived fixed-constant consequence.
Depends on
- Erdős–Rényi random graph and high probability
- Globally synchronizing graph — Definition 1.1
- Asymptotic quantifiers and uniform parameter ranges
- Earlier thresholds with explicit source quantifiers and a fixed-scale deduction
- Logarithmic tangent bound and a quadratic entropy envelope
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 4, Section 1; PDF p. 5, opening paragraph