Alphabeta Math
Open problemQuestion: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Useful finite-size synchronization estimates near threshold

PDF p. 38: Section 7, last paragraph on p. 38

Open problem

Assume countable choice. For a fixed γ>1, set pn=γlog⁡n/n for integers n for which pn≤1. In the Erdős–Rényi model, G(n,pn) has vertex set {1,…,n} and each unordered pair of distinct vertices is independently an edge with probability pn. A graph is globally synchronizing when, for normalized uniform initial phase volume, its identical-oscillator Kuramoto flow in the rotating frame converges to a fully synchronized state for almost every initial state.

Find explicit, optimized upper bounds B(n,γ) for the probability that G(n,pn) is not globally synchronizing, valid at stated finite values of n and useful at practically relevant sizes throughout the prescribed logarithmic family pn=γlog⁡n/n with fixed γ>1. Describe the dependence of these bounds on γ as γ↓1. In particular, address γ=2, that is, pn=2log⁡n/n. One concrete form of the question is to give an explicit threshold N(γ,δ) such that B(n,γ)≤δ for every integer n≥N(γ,δ) and a prescribed failure tolerance 0<δ<1. What counts as practically useful depends on the intended range of n and tolerance; no numerical target is asserted here.

Status

As of 2026-11-14, this item records the finite-size optimization question raised by the article, not a claimed solution or a completed review of subsequent literature. The article says that its asymptotically sharp G(n,p) result was not optimized for practically relevant sizes, particularly near the connectivity threshold, and that the example p=2log⁡n/n may require an impractically large n.

The completed quantitative synchrony supplier gives a partial asymptotic result: under countable choice, for 0<ε<1 and 1+ε<γ<1+ε−2, some C(γ,ε)>0 bounds the failure probability by C(γ,ε)n−ε for all sufficiently large n. For example, γ=2 and ε=1/2 satisfy these inequalities. This existential statement does not provide the explicit constants or finite-size threshold requested above. The supplier distinguishes its synchrony conclusion from the article's separately refuted exact-expansion probability assertion; that assertion is not used here.

Source notes

The motivation and the example are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF p. 38, Section 7. The article does not establish an answer to the finite-size question in that passage.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources