How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Symmetry and moments in the random-matrix discussion
PDF p. 31: Section 6 paragraph before (6.1)
Statement
In its discussion of the centered adjacency matrix of , the article describes centered Bernoulli entries as nonsymmetrically distributed and says that, if the distribution were symmetric, all even moments would vanish and much of the machinery in [7,47] would give precise bounds. The parity assertion is incorrect: symmetry about zero forces integrable odd moments to vanish, not even moments in general.
For distinct vertices, an entry of is , where is Bernoulli: with probability and with probability . For , this centered law is symmetric about zero exactly when . The diagonal entry is the deterministic value under the loop-free convention.
A concrete symmetric counterexample to the printed parity assertion is , where are independent Bernoulli variables on the four-outcome space with each outcome having probability . Its law is symmetric about zero, but . More precisely, let be integers and let be a real symmetric random matrix on one probability space. Suppose its upper-triangular entries, including the diagonal, are mutually independent, each has a law symmetric about zero, and for every . In the closed-walk expansion of , every term containing an unordered edge, including a loop, with odd multiplicity vanishes.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
In the loop-free graph , distinct-edge indicators are Bernoulli, and because (Erdős–Rényi random graph and high probability, Centered graph matrices and reference degree, Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials).
A finite probability space has nonnegative outcome weights summing to one, and event probabilities are sums of their outcome weights (Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities). Two finite-valued variables are independent when their joint assignment probabilities factor into their marginal probabilities (Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables). For and independent Bernoulli variables on one finite probability space, the difference has symmetric law and (Finite Bernoulli difference laws and parity of moments). Finite expectation is the probability-weighted sum of values (Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space).
For integers , let be a real symmetric random matrix on one probability space, with mutually independent upper-triangular entries including the diagonal and for all . The closed-walk expansion of factors each walk expectation into moments of its distinct unordered edges, including loops. If every entry law is symmetric about zero, each factor whose edge multiplicity is odd vanishes (Trace powers, closed walks and independent edge moments).
For an integrable real random variable , expectation is the finite integral (Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable). For a real random variable with law and a Borel function such that is integrable, (Change of variables for expectation). The Lebesgue integral is linear on , so scalar multiples of an integrable variable are integrable and for real (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L¹(μ)).
For every nonnegative integer , the real polynomial map is continuous on (Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, clause 5). A continuous map between topological spaces has Borel preimages of all Borel sets (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets). Thus these polynomial maps are measurable from to itself. Neither result requires a choice assumption.
Verification
Given: The graph convention and variables stated above, and the hypotheses in [F3] when applying the trace expansion.
Goal: Verify the centered entry law, the counterexample, and the corrected parity statement.
By [F1], an off-diagonal entry is , taking with probability and with probability . For both values occur. Equality of this two-point law with its reflection requires , and at the two reflected values have equal probability. The loop-free adjacency diagonal is zero, so the diagonal of is .
On , assign each of the four outcomes weight and set , . These nonnegative weights sum to one; each coordinate has probabilities at and , and every joint coordinate assignment has probability . Thus [F2] verifies a finite probability space and independent Bernoulli variables. Applying its difference-moment formula at gives a symmetric with , disproving the printed even-moment assertion.
Let be a real random variable whose law equals that of , and let be a positive odd integer such that is integrable. By [F5], is continuous on and has Borel preimages of every Borel set; it is therefore Borel measurable, as required by the law-integration formula in [F4]. Since , [F4] shows that is also integrable. Applying the law-integration formula in [F4] to and to therefore gives . Linearity from [F4] makes the last expectation . This is a finite real number by integrability, so .
Apply [F3] to and the integers in the Statement. All its hypotheses are imposed there: real symmetry on one probability space, mutual independence of the entire upper triangle including the diagonal, and finite absolute moments of order . In the expansion of , each walk expectation factors into entry moments; symmetry of each entry law makes an odd edge multiplicity supply a zero factor. Thus the stated even trace power has the claimed odd-multiplicity cancellation, including for loop edges.
Source notes
The printed parity assertion and the conditional claim that much of the machinery in [7,47] would give precise bounds for a symmetric entry distribution are attributed to the article’s Section 6, PDF page 31. The correction and example follow from the stated suppliers; no claim is made here about the precise results or applicability of [7,47].
Depends on
- Erdős–Rényi random graph and high probability
- Centered graph matrices and reference degree
- Finite Bernoulli difference laws and parity of moments
- Trace powers, closed walks and independent edge moments
- Bernoulli random variables and binomial random variables as sums of independent Bernoulli trials
- Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space
- Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable
- Change of variables for expectation
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on L¹(μ)
- Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities
- Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables
- Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function
- A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 31, Section 6, paragraph before (6.1)