How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The constant projection and centering decomposition
Statement
Let be a finite nonempty set, , and let have the inner product . Write for the function identically equal to , for the identity operator, , , and . Here . The constant subspace is , and .
Then is the orthogonal projection onto and is the orthogonal projection onto . For every , and .
If a linear operator is self-adjoint and satisfies for some , both and are invariant under , meaning that maps each subspace into itself, and vanishes on . For a nonregular operator, meaning here one for which is not a scalar multiple of , such invariance is not assumed.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
On , the stated inner product is conjugate-linear in its first argument and linear in its second; the conjugate transpose gives the adjoint, so a self-adjoint satisfies (Finite vertex Hilbert space in the article convention).
In a finite-dimensional inner product space, the orthogonal projection onto a subspace assigns to each vector its unique component in a decomposition with the other component in (The orthogonal projection P_Wv is the W-component in V=W⊕ W^⊥).
Proof
Given: A finite nonempty , the operators and subspaces in the statement, and, for the final assertion, a self-adjoint with .
Goal: Establish the projection, quadratic-form and invariance assertions.
For , put . Matrix multiplication gives and . Since , we have . Thus and . Moreover , since . The decomposition therefore identifies as the orthogonal projection onto .
The same decomposition identifies as the orthogonal projection onto : its remainder lies in , which is orthogonal to . Also .
If , then . If , self-adjointness gives ; hence . Finally , so . These deductions use the stated eigenvector and self-adjoint hypotheses; no invariance is asserted for nonregular operators.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.