How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rational bootstrap through the regular endpoint
Statement
Assume countable choice. Let be a finite connected undirected graph, with , symmetric binary adjacency matrix , and self-loops allowed and counted once in each row sum. Suppose every row sum is , let , and assume , where and is the all-ones matrix; the norm is the Euclidean operator norm. Let be a stable state, meaning a local minimum on the phase torus of . Choose representatives in after common rotation so that is real, where . Put , , and , where for and for .
If , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Regular Lemma 2.1 gives (First and second order parameter inequality — Lemma 2.1).
For and , one has . For , (Refined H mass bound in a regular graph).
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Adjacency spectral expander — Definition 1.3.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Daido order parameters.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Bounds, saturation, and rotation of order parameters.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Truncated sine-square function.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Centered graph matrices and reference degree.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Loewner order, Hermitian inner product, and operator norm.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives.
Definition or convention used in the Statement: The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω).
Proof
Given: The graph, stable normalized state, parameters and notation in the Statement.
Goal: Establish all the asserted estimates.
The zero-degree case follows from [F2]. Otherwise and . Dropping in [F1] gives . If for , then and . Hence [F1] and [F2] may be squared to give .
For successive integer pairs , the integer differences are respectively , all positive. Thus the last lower bound of step 1.1 exceeds for each pair. Start with and apply these six inequalities consecutively to get , including the exact endpoint .
Depends on
- Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation
- Adjacency spectral expander — Definition 1.3
- Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima
- Daido order parameters
- Bounds, saturation, and rotation of order parameters
- Truncated sine-square function
- Centered graph matrices and reference degree
- Loewner order, Hermitian inner product, and operator norm
- Phasors, trigonometric identities and periodic derivatives
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
- Refined H mass bound in a regular graph
- First and second order parameter inequality — Lemma 2.1
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.