How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounds, saturation, and rotation of order parameters
PDF p. 11: Section 2.1 prose following (2.7)
Statement
Let be a nonempty finite vertex set, , and let assign to each vertex a phase, meaning a real angle modulo . For every integer , the Daido order parameter satisfies . If , all phases coincide modulo . If , the phasors lie in one common rotation of the th roots of unity, the complex numbers with .
For nonzero , an argument of is the phase satisfying ; it is the direction of the mean phasor and is called the average phase. A global rotation, meaning addition of one common phase to every , can make real and nonnegative. If , it is already zero and has no argument. After rotation, each phase has a unique representative in .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The Daido parameter is the average of the phasors , independently of the chosen real representatives of the phases (Daido order parameters).
For a nonempty finite family of unit phasors, the modulus of their average is at most one and equals one exactly when all the phasors coincide. For positive integer , equality for the average of is equivalent to the lying in a common rotation of the th roots of unity (Rigidity and rotation of a unit-phasor average).
A global rotation adds the same phase to each coordinate. For the mean phasor , rotation by changes it to ; if , rotation by minus its argument makes it positive real (Diagonal phase rotations and relative-phase coordinates, Justification).
For a finite undirected graph with nonempty vertex set and symmetric adjacency matrix, each phase has a unique representative in (Global rotation equivalence of phase configurations).
Proof
Given: A nonempty finite set , phases for , and an integer .
Goal: Establish the modulus and saturation claims, the interpretation of the argument, and the rotation and representative convention.
Choose real representatives of the finitely many phases. By [F1], is their average . Applying [F2] gives and, when equality holds, places the phasors in a common rotation of the th roots of unity. For , the only first root of unity is , so equality makes all phasors equal and hence all phases coincide modulo .
By [F1], is the mean phasor, so for its argument is precisely the direction described as average phase. By [F3], rotating by minus that argument makes the new equal to . If , the rotation formula in [F3] leaves it zero; in this case no argument is defined and no preferred rotation is selected.
To apply [F4], equip with the edgeless graph and its zero adjacency matrix. This graph is finite and undirected, its vertex set is nonempty, and its adjacency matrix is symmetric. Hence [F4] supplies the unique representative of each rotated phase in . No connectedness assumption is required by [F4]. Together with steps 1.1 and 1.2 this proves the claims.
Source notes
The claims and conventions are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF page 11, Section 2.1. The article subsequently assumes the graph is connected; connectedness is not needed for the finite phasor argument above.
Depends on
Used by · 16
- First and second order parameter inequality — Lemma 2.1
- Positive first order parameter — Corollary 2.2
- Centered-adjacency pointwise phase bounds
- Order parameter control of total H mass — Lemma 2.3
- Cubic estimates used for the order parameter bootstrap
- Tractable order parameter inequalities — Lemma 2.5
- Refined order estimates for regular graphs — Remark 2.7
- Angle and mass sequences in the amplification argument
- Small-set amplification — Lemma 4.2
- Large-set amplification — Lemma 4.3
- Regular-graph numerical contradiction threshold
- Mean-zero projection of the regular phase vector
- Refined H mass bound in a regular graph
- Rational bootstrap through the regular endpoint
- Both tractable inequalities at the regular endpoint
- Small-alpha first parameter and regular H mass
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF page 11, Section 2.1, prose following equation (2.7)