How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive first order parameter — Corollary 2.2
PDF p. 13: Corollary 2.2
Statement
Assume countable choice. Let be a finite connected undirected graph with , symmetric binary adjacency matrix , and possible self-loops. Let and , and suppose is an -expander: , where is the all-ones matrix and the norm is the Euclidean operator norm. Let be a stable state, meaning a local minimum on the phase torus of the energy . For put , where phases are angles modulo . Use the common-rotation convention under which is real and nonnegative and phases have representatives in . Then .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Under countable choice and the stated connected expander, stable-state and rotation hypotheses, the first and second order parameters satisfy (First and second order parameter inequality — Lemma 2.1, The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)).
A common phase rotation can make real and nonnegative, including the case in which it is zero, and representatives may be chosen in (Bounds, saturation, and rotation of order parameters).
Proof
Given: The graph, parameters and stable state in the Statement, under countable choice and the stated rotation convention.
Goal: Show .
Since , [F1] gives . The assumption makes the right-hand side strictly positive, so .
By [F2] and the chosen convention, is real and nonnegative. Its strictly positive square therefore implies , as claimed.
Source notes
Corollary 2.2 of the cited article states this positivity conclusion under the article's preceding connectedness and phase-normalization conventions. The citation is attribution; the argument above uses [F1].
Depends on
- Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation
- Adjacency spectral expander — Definition 1.3
- Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima
- Daido order parameters
- Bounds, saturation, and rotation of order parameters
- First and second order parameter inequality — Lemma 2.1
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing — Abdalla, Bandeira, Kassabov, Souza, Strogatz, Townsend (2026) · PDF p. 11, phase convention; pp. 12–13, Lemma 2.1 and Corollary 2.2