How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tractable order parameter inequalities — Lemma 2.5
PDF p. 15: Lemma 2.5 and proof; PDF p. 16: Lemma 2.5 and proof
Statement
Assume countable choice. Let be a finite connected undirected graph, possibly with loops, with and symmetric binary adjacency matrix . Connected means that every two vertices are joined by a finite edge path. Let and , and suppose is an -expander: , where is the all-ones matrix and the norm is the Euclidean operator norm. Let be a stable state, meaning a local minimum on the phase torus of the energy . For put , using real representatives of the phases, and choose a common rotation so that is real and nonnegative. Then and .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Under the stated hypotheses and normalization, (Cubic estimates used for the order parameter bootstrap).
For the same connected expander and stable state, when is real and positive, (Lower bound for the second order parameter — Corollary 2.4).
For the same graph and stable state, (First and second order parameter inequality — Lemma 2.1).
Proof
Given: The connected expander, stable state, normalized order parameters, and parameter range in the Statement, under countable choice.
Goal: Prove both stated order-parameter bounds.
By [F1], is positive and . Therefore [F2] gives . Since , the right side is at least and in particular is nonnegative.
Because both sides of the bound in step 1.1 are nonnegative, squaring preserves it. Substituting into [F3] yields . The assumption gives , while the fourth-power term is nonnegative. Thus , completing both conclusions.
Source notes
The statement is attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, Lemma 2.5. The cubic supplier treats the endpoint separately; the argument above uses its proved estimate rather than importing the article's claim as a premise.
Depends on
- Adjacency, degrees, graph Laplacian, and spectral notation
- Adjacency spectral expander — Definition 1.3
- Equilibria, stable states, synchronized states, and spurious minima
- Daido order parameters
- Bounds, saturation, and rotation of order parameters
- Cubic estimates used for the order parameter bootstrap
- First and second order parameter inequality — Lemma 2.1
- Lower bound for the second order parameter — Corollary 2.4
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF pp. 15–16, Lemma 2.5 and proof; p. 11, Section 2.1 standing conventions