How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quantitative synchronization speed from random initial conditions
PDF p. 39: Section 7, penultimate paragraph
Open problem
Assume countable choice. Let be a finite undirected graph with nonempty vertex set and symmetric adjacency matrix , and consider the homogeneous graph Kuramoto system
Here each phase is an element of , the common intrinsic frequency is , and the initial state is chosen uniformly from . In the rotating frame write modulo . A state is fully synchronized when all its phase coordinates are equal.
How quickly does the trajectory from a random initial state synchronize when the graph is sufficiently expanding? Can the article's techniques give a quantitative bound showing rapid synchronization? For example, one may ask for bounds, with specified probability, on the time needed for the rotating-frame trajectory to enter and remain within a prescribed distance of the set of fully synchronized states. Such a bound would need to state its dependence on the graph, the distance tolerance and the allowed failure probability. This example makes the type of rate precise; it does not impose a particular rate or probability bound on the authors' question.
For one notion of expansion used in the article, an -expander has and satisfies , where is the all-ones matrix and the norm is the Euclidean operator norm. The question does not specify a single threshold for “sufficiently expanding.”
Status
In Section 7 the authors state that they have not considered the speed question and express the belief that their techniques can show rather rapid synchronization for sufficiently expanding graphs. They provide no rate there. As of 13 November 2026, the question is recorded as unresolved in this item; the limited source check does not establish that every possible quantitative version remains open in the subsequent literature.
Source notes
The question and the authors' expectation are attributed to Expander graphs are globally synchronizing, PDF p. 39, Section 7. The article's Definition 1.1 specifies uniform initial phases in its global-synchronization setting. This attribution is not a proof of a convergence rate.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Expander graphs are globally synchronizing · PDF p. 39, Section 7, penultimate paragraph; pp. 2–3, Definition 1.1