How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Floor and ceiling thresholds in logarithmic degree estimates
Statement
Let be real, , and for integers put , where is the natural logarithm and . Then .
For , let be the unique integer satisfying , and let be if and otherwise. Define the piecewise linear interpolation . For either or , .
In particular, fix and . If , and for integers sufficiently large, then the last difference is at most for all sufficiently large , with the threshold depending only on and . Thus it is : its absolute value is bounded by a constant multiple of eventually. The interpolation uses factorials only at integers; a factorial at a noninteger would require a separately specified extension.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The factorial recursion gives , with , for every integer (The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ).
The natural logarithm is increasing on positive reals and satisfies there (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).
Every real number has a unique integer part with (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m ≤ x < m + 1).
Proof
Given: The quantities and hypotheses in the statement.
Goal: Prove the increment, interpolation bound, and stated eventual budget.
By factorial recursion and the logarithm product law, . Subtracting the two definitions of therefore gives .
Put , so . The interpolation lies on the line segment between and . Each permitted endpoint is one of these values, so its distance from the interpolation is at most . Since , logarithm monotonicity gives ; the triangle inequality and step 1.1 yield the stated bound.
For sufficiently large , , and . Hence and . The bound in step 2.1 is therefore at most . As tends to infinity, the fixed latter terms are at most eventually. This proves the and big-O assertions. The construction only evaluates factorials at and .
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.