Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Floor and ceiling thresholds in logarithmic degree estimates

Statement

Let an,cn be real, bn>0, and for integers k≥0 put Fn(k)=an+klog⁡bn−log⁡(k!)+cnk, where log⁡ is the natural logarithm and 0!=1. Then Fn(k+1)−Fn(k)=log⁡bn−log⁡(k+1)+cn.

For t≥0, let m=⌊t⌋ be the unique integer satisfying m≤t<m+1, and let ⌈t⌉ be m if t=m and m+1 otherwise. Define the piecewise linear interpolation F~n(t)=(1−(t−m))Fn(m)+(t−m)Fn(m+1). For either r=⌊t⌋ or r=⌈t⌉, ∣Fn(r)−F~n(t)∣≤∣log⁡bn∣+log⁡(m+1)+∣cn∣.

In particular, fix γ>0 and C≥0. If bn=γlog⁡n, ∣cn∣≤C and 0≤m≤Clog⁡n for integers n sufficiently large, then the last difference is at most 4log⁡log⁡n for all sufficiently large n, with the threshold depending only on γ and C. Thus it is O(log⁡log⁡n): its absolute value is bounded by a constant multiple of log⁡log⁡n eventually. The interpolation uses factorials only at integers; a factorial at a noninteger would require a separately specified extension.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The factorial recursion gives (k+1)!=(k+1)k!, with k!>0, for every integer k≥0 (The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^k̲, defined by recursion in ℕ).

[F2]

The natural logarithm is increasing on positive reals and satisfies log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y there (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[F3]

Every real number has a unique integer part m with m≤t<m+1 (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m ≤ x < m + 1).

Proof

Given: The quantities and hypotheses in the statement.

Goal: Prove the increment, interpolation bound, and stated eventual budget.

1.1F1F2algebra

By factorial recursion and the logarithm product law, log⁡((k+1)!)=log⁡(k+1)+log⁡(k!). Subtracting the two definitions of Fn therefore gives Fn(k+1)−Fn(k)=log⁡bn−log⁡(k+1)+cn.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Put u=t−m, so 0≤u<1. The interpolation lies on the line segment between Fn(m) and Fn(m+1). Each permitted endpoint is one of these values, so its distance from the interpolation is at most ∣Fn(m+1)−Fn(m)∣. Since m+1≥1, logarithm monotonicity gives log⁡(m+1)≥0; the triangle inequality and step 1.1 yield the stated bound.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra∎

For sufficiently large n, log⁡log⁡n≥0, and m+1≤(C+1)log⁡n. Hence ∣log⁡bn∣≤∣log⁡γ∣+log⁡log⁡n and log⁡(m+1)≤log⁡(C+1)+log⁡log⁡n. The bound in step 2.1 is therefore at most 2log⁡log⁡n+∣log⁡γ∣+log⁡(C+1)+C. As log⁡log⁡n tends to infinity, the fixed latter terms are at most 2log⁡log⁡n eventually. This proves the 4log⁡log⁡n and big-O assertions. The construction only evaluates factorials at m and m+1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.