How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independent inputs for the critical-density bounds
Statement
The independent sources establish an upper critical-density bound for homogeneous attractive unit-coupling networks, and Canale constructs nonsynchronizing graph families approaching density from the stated side. The lower example uses positive stability transverse to rotation; its graph construction is not a consequence of expansion alone.
Facts & Assumptions
We assume The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω). A graph here has a nonempty finite vertex set , symmetric binary adjacency , and possible self-loops, counted once in the degree , as in Finite symmetric networks and loop removal. Put and . For a loop-free graph with , write and . The rotating-frame system and its trajectories are specified in External input. Global synchronization means convergence to an all-equal phase state for every initial phase outside a phase-null set, with the normalized measure of Normalized phase volume and almost-everywhere assertions.
The exact nonsynchronizing family, its sequence of loop-free densities and its strict transverse stability certificate are supplied by A simple nonsynchronizing family approaching eleven sixteenths. In particular, failure of global synchronization is part of that proposition's statement.
The independent Kassabov–Strogatz–Townsend result specified in External input supplies global synchronization when , with the model, loop and measure conventions in [F1].
To specify the threshold used here, let be the set of real numbers with the following property: for every real there is an integer such that every graph in [F1] on vertices with globally synchronizes. The cutoff depends on , not on the graph. The critical connectivity threshold is the smallest member of ; its existence is established below. This definition permits loops, and uses an eventual cutoff in graph order.
Every nonempty set of real numbers bounded above has a supremum (Dedekind completeness: the least-upper-bound property).
External input
Use the independent source's rotating-frame homogeneous attractive unit-coupling system on :
Here a forward trajectory from is a curve with , differentiable in local real angular lifts and satisfying the displayed equation in those lifts. The equation is Eq. (1) of Kassabov–Strogatz–Townsend, Section I, p. 1, with the sine arguments reversed and the corresponding minus sign. Its phases are already in the rotating frame of the common intrinsic frequency. Global synchronization is point convergence of these trajectories to an all-equal phase state, which may depend on , outside a set of initial phases of Lebesgue measure zero. The phase-null convention in [F1] is the same convention after normalizing the finite phase volume.
Import the following theorem for this system: with symmetric binary adjacency, a loop at every vertex and , the network globally synchronizes. The source's Theorem 5 states uniqueness of the all-in-phase stable equilibrium up to simultaneous rotation, and the paragraph immediately following its proof gives the global-synchronization conclusion; that full implication is imported. Section II, Eq. (2), gives after adding loops to a loop-free graph of minimum degree . A loop term is zero because , so adding or deleting loops changes neither the equation nor its trajectories. This is an external theorem input, not a local reconstruction of its global-flow proof. Its strict inequality concerns , not a critical equality case.
Proof
Given: The graph, dynamics, phase-volume and threshold conventions in [F1], [F3] and [F4], the family in [F2], and completeness in [F5].
Goal: Establish the graphwise upper bound and for the specified threshold.
For a loop-free graph on vertices with , adding a loop at every vertex gives . The imported theorem supplies global synchronization, and loop invariance transfers it to the original graph. Thus every simple loop-free graph with globally synchronizes. The one-vertex graph is already synchronous.
By [F2], for every integer there is a simple graph on vertices of density , with a nonsynchronous equilibrium having positive transverse Hessian, and the graph fails global synchronization. These densities tend to from below. Given any , choose a real with . For every sufficiently large , , and the orders are unbounded. Thus for every integer cutoff there is a nonsynchronizing member of this family with and minimum degree greater than . This contradicts the property required for , so . This certificate uses the explicit weighted precursor and its spinning construction, not expansion alone.
Fix any real and choose an integer with . If a graph on vertices satisfies , deleting its loops decreases each degree by at most one. The resulting simple graph has minimum degree at least , so step 1.1 gives global synchronization. Its trajectories and those of the original graph coincide. Consequently .
Step 2.1 makes nonempty, while step 1.2 shows that every member of is at least . Hence is nonempty and bounded above, and [F5] supplies its supremum . Put . Then for every ; and for each there is with , since otherwise would be an upper bound for all , contradicting leastness of . Apply the defining property of this at the parameter to obtain the cutoff required for . Thus is the smallest member of , proving existence of in [F4]. Steps 2.1 and 1.2 now give .
Source notes
The lower construction is attributed to Canale, Section V, Theorem 2, printed p. 15. Its explicit edge and phase conventions and special transverse-stability argument are supplied by [F2]. Canale defines strong density as degree divided by order minus one on p. 4, whereas the displayed finite density calculations on pp. 14–15 divide by . The local family uses and still approaches from below. No general weighted-network stability-transfer theorem is used. The upper global-synchronization result is the precisely limited independent input above; the threshold argument is local. The article under study supplies no premise for this prerequisite.
Depends on
- Finite symmetric networks and loop removal
- Normalized phase volume and almost-everywhere assertions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice (AC_ω)
- A simple nonsynchronizing family approaching eleven sixteenths
- Dedekind completeness: the least-upper-bound property
- Kassabov, Strogatz and Townsend, Sufficiently dense Kuramoto networks are globally synchronizing, arXiv:2105.11406v1 · Section I, p. 1, Eq. (1) and definition of global synchronization; Section II, p. 2, Eq. (2); Section V, p. 5, Theorem 5 and the paragraph immediately following its proof
- Eduardo A. Canale, From weighted to unweighted graphs in Synchronizing Graph Theory, arXiv:2209.06362v3 · Section II.A, printed p. 4 (strong density); Section V, printed pp. 14–15 (regular degree, parameters, and Theorem 2)
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For the rotating-frame system dot(theta_j)=sum_k A_jk sin(theta_k-theta_j) with symmetric binary adjacency, adding self-loops does not change trajectories. With a loop at every vertex, tilde_mu>3/4 guarantees convergence to an all-in-phase state for almost all initial phases. For a loop-free graph of minimum degree delta, adding these loops gives tilde_mu=(delta+1)/n. Theorem 5 states uniqueness of the stable equilibrium up to rotation; the following paragraph explicitly supplies global synchronization.
Hypotheses: Finitely many identical oscillators, symmetric binary adjacency, homogeneous frequencies removed by the common rotating frame, attractive unit coupling, and a loop at every vertex for the tilde_mu convention. Global synchronization is convergence to an all-in-phase state outside a Lebesgue-null set of initial phases. The inequality tilde_mu>3/4 is strict. It also forces the support graph to be connected.
Reading limits: Read the cached PDF text on pp. 1, 2 and 5 at the stated passages, including the proof of Theorem 5 and its following paragraph; checked the online v1 PDF text for the model and loop convention. No image inspection or reconstruction of Lemmas 1–4 or their cited prerequisites is claimed. The global-synchronization implication is imported as stated, rather than inferred locally solely from uniqueness of stable equilibria.
Strong density is minimum degree divided by order minus one. The Section V spinning family has order 8k and regular degree a+2b+c+d+k-1, with parameters (a,b,c,d)=(k,k,k,ceil(k/2)-1); Theorem 2 gives the lower critical-connectivity bound 11/16. The displayed finite density calculations on pp. 14–15 divide by 8k.
Hypotheses: Simple graphs, positive integer weights in the weighted precursor, homogeneous attractive Kuramoto dynamics and an integer spinning parameter at least the maximum edge weight. The supplied local family uses k>=3 and its own special transverse-stability proof, rather than assuming the inapplicable general transfer condition discussed by the source.
Reading limits: Read the cached PDF text on printed pp. 4, 14 and 15 for definition, parameters, degree, limiting density and attribution. The construction and stability argument used here are supplied by the declared local family proposition; no reconstruction of that chain, image inspection, general weighted stability transfer or Appendix A calculation is claimed.
Sources
- Kassabov, Strogatz and Townsend, Sufficiently dense Kuramoto networks are globally synchronizing, arXiv:2105.11406v1 · Section I, p. 1, Eq. (1) and definition of global synchronization; Section II, p. 2, Eq. (2); Section V, p. 5, Theorem 5 and the paragraph immediately following its proof
- Eduardo A. Canale, From weighted to unweighted graphs in Synchronizing Graph Theory, arXiv:2209.06362v3 · Section II.A, printed p. 4 (strong density); Section V, printed pp. 14–15 (regular degree, parameters, and Theorem 2)