Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The fixed-degree Alon–Boppana lower bound

Statement

For each fixed integer d≥3, a sequence of finite d-regular graphs with orders tending to infinity has largest absolute nonconstant adjacency eigenvalue at least 2d−1−o(1). The error is in the growing-order limit at fixed degree. This lower bound concerns achievable expansion and does not establish any synchronization threshold.

More precisely, graphs may be arbitrary symmetric nonnegative integer adjacency-slot matrices An with every row sum d, including loops and repeated edges. The quantity meant is Λn=∥An−(d/n)J∥op, where J is the all-ones matrix and the norm is Euclidean. For n≥2, this equals max⁡2≤i≤n∣λi(An)∣, retaining every eigenvalue except one constant-vector eigenvalue d. For n=1, Λ1=0 and no maximum over nonconstant eigenvalues is used. For every ε>0, eventually Λn≥2d−1−ε. No connectedness or nonbipartiteness is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

Goal: Establish every assertion in the statement.

[F1]

For n≥2, the centered norm is the largest absolute nonconstant eigenvalue, with multiplicities retained; for n=1, the centered norm is zero (Regular adjacency spectra and normalized expansion).

[F2]

For fixed d,k and every η>0, eventually Λn≥Ck1/(2k)d−1−η, for the full adjacency-slot convention (Extracting a nonconstant eigenvalue from closed-walk moments).

[F3]

The Dyck-word numbers satisfy Ck1/(2k)→2 (Dyck words and elementary Catalan growth).

[F4]

The asymptotic error is at fixed degree and along increasing graph order (Asymptotic quantifiers and uniform parameter ranges).

Proof

1.1F2F3F4choosealgebra

Fix d≥3 and ε>0. By [F3], choose an integer k≥1 such that Ck1/(2k)d−1≥2d−1−ε/2. Keep this k fixed when letting the order grow. Apply [F2] with η=ε/2. Beyond its order cutoff, Λn≥2d−1−ε.

2.1F1F4step 1.1algebra∎

Since n→∞, eventually n≥2, so [F1] identifies this with the claimed absolute nonconstant adjacency bound. If an order-one term occurs, its matrix is [d] and its centered matrix is [d]−d[1]=[0], giving Λ1=0 as stated. This initial term has no effect on an eventual assertion. Equivalently put rn=max⁡{0,2d−1−Λn}. Step 1.1 says rn→0, and Λn≥2d−1−rn, which is exactly the stated one-sided o(1) formulation. Since every helper counted actual slot labels, the conclusion includes diagonal entries counted once and parallel slots without a convention transfer. No synchronization or construction assertion was used or proved.

Source notes

The independent source is Hoory–Linial–Wigderson, Expander Graphs and Their Applications, May 2006 draft: §2.1, p. 19 allows self-loops and multiple edges; §2.4, p. 21 defines the absolute nonconstant parameter; §2.5, Theorem 2.7, p. 22 states the fixed-degree bound; §5.2.1–5.2.2, pp. 49–50 supplies the closed-walk/Catalan method and explicitly distinguishes it from the stronger second-eigenvalue bound. Those passages were read in the retained PDF. This proof uses the same moment method, but replaces the source's distant-vertices Rayleigh quotient with a trace argument and proves the Dyck-word count and slot-label injection explicitly. The fixed-loop reversal construction addresses the library's allowance of arbitrary diagonal slot counts; it does not infer that an ordinary two-incidence loop is identical to a single diagonal slot. The source is independent background and method attribution, not an outstanding imported logical premise. No complete reading of Chapter 5 or reconstruction of its stronger diameter estimate, explicit Ramanujan constructions, or other cited literature is claimed.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources