How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
J equals five absorption-emission code
PDF p. 6: Æ-code bullet and Fig. 4
Definition
The article describes absorption–emission (Æ) codes as a family protecting against absorption–emission noise. Its selected instance uses the orthonormal magnetic basis , , and the two codewords and . The code is their linear span. The encoding is the linear map from a two-dimensional logical space with orthonormal basis that sends these basis vectors to , respectively.
For a precise error contract, choose a finite set of spin labels containing , with for every . Let be the orthogonal direct sum with one labelled copy of each block, let be the inclusion, and let be the orthogonal projection onto the input block. Regard the codewords and encoding as taking values in via . For each and , take every component , , of every rank- spherical tensor family in the error-span contract. The order-one absorption–emission error span is the complex linear span in , the space of complex-linear endomorphisms of , of and all . Rank refers to the tensor transformation law, not matrix rank. The article says this code corrects rank-one transitions with nonoverlapping error spaces. In the stated coherent error-span contract, the precise condition established below is for every two errors in the span, where is the orthogonal projector on onto the embedded code. In particular, : the error spaces generated from the two different codewords are orthogonal. This does not assert that the spaces generated by different errors on the same codeword are mutually orthogonal, or that every individually resolved matrix-unit transition belongs to the error span.
Definition references
Justification
The magnetic basis is orthonormal. Each displayed codeword has squared norm , and their supports are disjoint, so they are orthogonal. Thus the encoding is an isometry and the code projector is well defined. Angular-momentum basis and tensor labels Code restriction and decoded channel types
The union of the magnetic supports is , whose consecutive gaps are . Both codewords have zeroth moment , first moment , and second moment : for the latter two are and , and for they are and . The spaced-support moment criterion therefore gives the pair-product condition for the selected coherent tensor error span. Taking its matrix element between the orthogonal codewords gives the displayed cross-term vanishing and hence orthogonality of the two generated error spaces. The error-span contract defines the selected blocks, tensor components and pair-product condition; it does not identify the span with all resolved matrix units. Each is an endomorphism of , so the span and all products are well typed. Order-one absorption–emission tensor error span Spaced-support moment criterion for order-one AE correction
Depends on
Used by · 10
- Æ rank-one correction with separated error spaces
- J equals four Aydin–Barg encoding
- Aydin–Barg rank-one correction and lower host angular momentum
- Checking-time comparison under the Jm lift
- Spacing interpretation and rate-normalization qualification
- Changing the lift to rotational-energy scaling
- Jump-time dephasing vanishes with the checking interval
- Proposed augmented Jz syndrome check for an uncalibrated lift
- Well-defined augmented syndrome and first-order rotation correction
- Zero-lift checking-time fits versus physical decay rate
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Monolithic Quantum Error Correction in the Presence of Distinguishability · PDF p. 4, paragraph introducing the candidate codes; p. 6, Æ-code bullet and Fig. 4