Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Order-one absorption–emission tensor error span

Definition

Fix a spin label J and its finite spin block VJ, with magnetic basis and spherical tensor families as in Finite spin blocks, spherical tensors and Clebsch–Gordan phases. Choose a finite set S of spin labels containing J, with ∣J′−J∣≤1 for every J′∈S. Let H=⨁J′∈SVJ′, using one labelled copy of each block, and let ιJ′:VJ′→H be its inclusion and πJ:H→VJ the orthogonal projection onto the input block.

For each J′∈S and k∈{0,1}, take every component Tq:VJ→VJ′, −k≤q≤k, of every rank-k spherical tensor family in the cited convention. The order-one absorption–emission tensor error span for these selected blocks is the complex linear span in L(H) of IH and all ιJ′TqπJ. The selected target blocks and the tensor-family equations are part of the contract. Tensor rank here means k, not matrix rank. A component is one coherent linear map over its magnetic labels; an individually resolved matrix unit ∣J′,m′⟩⟨J,m∣ is a distinct operator and is included only if it actually lies in the stated span.

Let V:HL→VJ be an isometry from a nonzero finite-dimensional logical space and regard it as a map into H. Its code projector is P=VV∗ on H, as in Code restriction and decoded channel types. The code detects the span when, for every E in it, PEP=cEP for some complex scalar cE. It satisfies the pair-product Knill–Laflamme correction condition for the span when, for every E,F in it, PE∗FP=cE,FP for some complex scalar cE,F. These conditions concern the complete selected span; no particular channel or physical recovery is specified by this definition.

Justification

The tensor supplier defines each Tq as a linear map between the named finite blocks, so ιJ′TqπJ is an endomorphism of H. The complex span of these endomorphisms and IH is therefore a well-defined subspace of the finite-dimensional space L(H), even if some tensor families are zero. The code-restriction supplier gives the orthogonal projector P from the isometry. Consequently PEP and PE∗FP are endomorphisms of H, and both displayed scalar-multiple conditions are well typed. Checking them on any spanning family suffices: the first condition is linear in E, and the second is conjugate-linear in E and linear in F. Finite spin blocks, spherical tensors and Clebsch–Gordan phases Code restriction and decoded channel types

Source notes

The cited paper gives the pair-product and single-operator conditions and coherent dipole operators for its fixed-J model. The general finite choice of target blocks and the span convention above make the scope explicit for this collection; they do not assert that every such operator is a realized physical error.

Depends on

Used by · 16

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Absorption-Emission Codes for Atomic and Molecular Quantum Information Platforms · pp. 2–3, Eq. (2) and the discussion and operators immediately following it

For fixed total angular momentum, the paper gives pair-product Knill–Laflamme conditions, a single-operator detection condition, and coherent magnetic-label sums for dipole transition operators.

Hypotheses: Fixed input angular-momentum manifold and the paper's dipole-transition model; the listed operators are subject to the paper's allowed target manifolds.

Reading limits: Read the cited discussion, conditions, and displayed operator definitions. The abstract finite-span convention and its typing below are a local adaptation; no source proof, experimental validation, or audit is claimed.

Sources