How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Order-one absorption–emission tensor error span
Definition
Fix a spin label and its finite spin block , with magnetic basis and spherical tensor families as in Finite spin blocks, spherical tensors and Clebsch–Gordan phases. Choose a finite set of spin labels containing , with for every . Let , using one labelled copy of each block, and let be its inclusion and the orthogonal projection onto the input block.
For each and , take every component , , of every rank- spherical tensor family in the cited convention. The order-one absorption–emission tensor error span for these selected blocks is the complex linear span in of and all . The selected target blocks and the tensor-family equations are part of the contract. Tensor rank here means , not matrix rank. A component is one coherent linear map over its magnetic labels; an individually resolved matrix unit is a distinct operator and is included only if it actually lies in the stated span.
Let be an isometry from a nonzero finite-dimensional logical space and regard it as a map into . Its code projector is on , as in Code restriction and decoded channel types. The code detects the span when, for every in it, for some complex scalar . It satisfies the pair-product Knill–Laflamme correction condition for the span when, for every in it, for some complex scalar . These conditions concern the complete selected span; no particular channel or physical recovery is specified by this definition.
Justification
The tensor supplier defines each as a linear map between the named finite blocks, so is an endomorphism of . The complex span of these endomorphisms and is therefore a well-defined subspace of the finite-dimensional space , even if some tensor families are zero. The code-restriction supplier gives the orthogonal projector from the isometry. Consequently and are endomorphisms of , and both displayed scalar-multiple conditions are well typed. Checking them on any spanning family suffices: the first condition is linear in , and the second is conjugate-linear in and linear in . Finite spin blocks, spherical tensors and Clebsch–Gordan phases Code restriction and decoded channel types
Source notes
The cited paper gives the pair-product and single-operator conditions and coherent dipole operators for its fixed- model. The general finite choice of target blocks and the span convention above make the scope explicit for this collection; they do not assert that every such operator is a realized physical error.
Depends on
Used by · 16
- Rank-one transition errors in the benchmark
- Detection-code errors retain partial logical information
- J equals five absorption-emission code
- Æ rank-one correction with separated error spaces
- J equals four Aydin–Barg encoding
- Aydin–Barg rank-one correction and lower host angular momentum
- Fast-interval decay approaches a correctable coherent error
- Jump-time dephasing vanishes with the checking interval
- Calibrated fast checks restore ideal rank-one correction
- Well-defined augmented syndrome and first-order rotation correction
- Spaced-support moment criterion for order-one AE correction
- Finite signed-code KL product test
- Finite spanning-list compression and channel qualification
- Low-rank tensor families are spin polynomials
- Pair-product correction detects quadratic spin errors
- Both selected codes have exact tensor-rank distance three
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For fixed total angular momentum, the paper gives pair-product Knill–Laflamme conditions, a single-operator detection condition, and coherent magnetic-label sums for dipole transition operators.
Hypotheses: Fixed input angular-momentum manifold and the paper's dipole-transition model; the listed operators are subject to the paper's allowed target manifolds.
Reading limits: Read the cited discussion, conditions, and displayed operator definitions. The abstract finite-span convention and its typing below are a local adaptation; no source proof, experimental validation, or audit is claimed.
Sources
- Absorption-Emission Codes for Atomic and Molecular Quantum Information Platforms · pp. 2–3, Eq. (2) and the discussion and operators immediately following it