Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Wigner–Eckart with explicit magnetic-label contract

Statement

Let H and K be finite direct sums of specified spin blocks, and let (Tq)q=−kk be a rank-k spherical tensor family from H to K, with integer k≥0. Fix an input copy of VJ and an output copy of VJ′. Write Am′,m,q for the coefficient of eJ′,m′ in the projection of TqeJ,m onto the chosen output copy. Here projection means the coordinate projection in the specified direct sum: it retains the chosen output coordinate and sets every other output coordinate to zero. Use the ordered coupling VJ⊗Vk and its chosen Clebsch–Gordan coefficients CJ,m;k,qJ′,m′. If J′ is not among ∣J−k∣,∣J−k∣+1,…,J+k, set these coefficients to zero. There is a complex number R, depending on the two copies, J,J′,k, the tensor family and the coupling convention but independent of m,m′,q, such that Am′,m,q=RCJ,m;k,qJ′,m′. This number is a reduced matrix element in this convention. In particular, Am′,m,q=0 unless m′=m+q and J′ is in the displayed coupling list. No parity selection rule or nonvanishing of R is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Spin blocks, their ladder operators, the tensor-family equations, and the ordered coupled-basis coefficients are as defined in Finite spin blocks, spherical tensors and Clebsch–Gordan phases.

[F2]

The ordered product VJ⊗Vk decomposes as one orthogonal spin-j summand for each j in the coupling list, with the normalized coupled ladder basis described in Tensor spin composition.

Proof

Given: The specified block copies and rank-k tensor family, with the conventions in F1.

Goal: Establish the stated factorization and selection rules.

1.1F1algebraconstruct

Write K=⨁β∈BVℓβ and let β0 index the chosen output copy, so ℓβ0=J′. Define P:K→K by P(gβ)β∈B=(hβ)β∈B, where hβ0=gβ0 and hβ=0 for β≠β0. This linear map satisfies P2=P and has the chosen output copy as its range. For a=z,+,−, both PJaKg and JaKPg have chosen coordinate Ja(J′)gβ0 and every other coordinate zero, by the blockwise definition in F1. Hence PJaK=JaKP. Identify the range of P with VJ′ and embed each eJ,m in the chosen input coordinate, with zeros elsewhere. Define the linear map F:VJ⊗Vk→VJ′ by F(eJ,m⊗ek,q)=PTqeJ,m under this identification. Applying the tensor-family equations and the ladder formulas to each product-basis vector gives Ja(J′)F=FJatot for a=z,+,−.

1.2F1F2algebrachoose

Suppose J′ is in the coupling list. The product-basis matrices of Jztot and J+tot are real. The highest-weight line of the J′ summand is therefore spanned by a real vector: the real and imaginary parts of any vector in that line satisfy the same real equations, and at least one is nonzero. Choose a normalized real highest-weight vector temporarily. Its coupled ladder vectors have real product-basis coefficients. The recorded highest-weight vector differs from this temporary choice by one unit scalar λ, so all recorded coefficients CJ,m;k,qJ′,M equal λ times real coefficients and their complex conjugates equal λ−2CJ,m;k,qJ′,M.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

For a coupled highest-weight vector uj, the intertwining equations show that Fuj has Jz weight j and is killed by J+. In the output spin block the ladder formulas show that a nonzero vector killed by J+ has weight J′; hence Fuj=0 if j≠J′, while for j=J′ it is a scalar multiple aeJ′,J′. Applying J− and the identical normalized ladder formulas gives FvJ′,M=aeJ′,M for every M, and F vanishes on all other coupled summands. If J′ is absent from the coupling list, F=0.

3.1F1F2step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

Expanding a product-basis vector in the orthonormal coupled basis and applying step 2.1 gives Am′,m,q=aCJ,m;k,qJ′,m′‾=aλ−2CJ,m;k,qJ′,m′. Set R=aλ−2; if J′ is absent set R=0. The total Jz eigenvalue of vJ′,m′ is m′, whereas that of eJ,m⊗ek,q is m+q, so its coefficient is zero unless these weights agree. The coupling list gives the other selection rule, and R can be zero, for example for the zero tensor family. This proves the contract.

Depends on

Used by · 4

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

The Wigner–Eckart Theorem, Physics 221A Notes 20 · Sections 6–7, equations (43)–(44) and the selection rules following equation (45)

Matrix elements of a rank-k irreducible tensor operator are a magnetic-label-independent reduced matrix element times the Clebsch–Gordan coefficient for coupling j and k to j-prime; the magnetic and triangle selection rules follow.

Hypotheses: Standard angular-momentum bases, fixed additional labels, and the irreducible tensor transformation law; coupling order and phase conventions must be matched.

Reading limits: Read the cited transformation law, theorem statement and selection rules. The proof below is locally authored; no independent source-proof review or acceptance is claimed.

Sources