Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transfer of a compatible spacetime norm through the free forcing map

Statement

Use the free-convolution, global-evolution and Bochner variation-of-constants interfaces on a prescribed forward interval I=[a,b]⊂[0,T], retaining their group and perturbation hypotheses, including Countable Choice. Regard E, C(I;E) and L1(I;E) as real spaces. Let YI be a real Banach space of time-dependent functions or distributions, with YI and C(I;E) injected by real-linear maps into the same Hausdorff real topological vector space AI. Equality in AI is the compatibility convention for their representatives. Assume the actual free orbit Hax(t)=W(t−a)x and the actual retarded operator Dag(t)=∫atW(t−s)g(s) ds define bounded real-linear maps into YI with norms at most AI and BI, respectively, for every x∈E and every g∈L1(I;E). Then the forced solution u(t)=S(t,a)x+∫atS(t,s)f(s) ds lies in YI and ∥u∥YI≤AI∥x∥+BI((b−a)KCI(∥x∥+∥f∥1)+∥f∥1), where CI=Mexp⁡(MK(b−a)). Bounds on subintervals are asserted with their stated constants; uniform bounds require uniform AI,BI. Backward spacetime bounds hold if the same orbit and forcing-map hypotheses are supplied after time reflection, with group W(−t) and the reflected coefficient −P.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compatible injections, the two bounded free maps on the named interval, and L1(I;E) forcing.

Goal: Obtain the additional spacetime estimate by applying a bounded map already supplied, without integrating into YI.

[F1]

Continuous free convolution on a finite time interval defines the actual retarded free forcing map in C(I;E), while the hypotheses here supply its compatible YI value for the same input.

[F2]

Global real evolution, cocycle and inverse and Bochner variation of constants for real evolution give the solution and the estimate ∥u∥C(I;E)≤CI(∥x∥+∥f∥1) with initial time a.

[F3]

The real Banach-space convention and its norm structure are supplied by Banach space. The bounds for the real-linear maps Ha:E→YI and Da:L1(I;E)→YI have the meaning of A bounded linear operator between normed spaces with common scalar field R. The ambient space is a Hausdorff TVS over R in Topological vector spaces over the real and complex fields; the injections are real-linear, and equality of their images is the stated compatibility convention.

Proof

Given: The compatible injections, the two bounded free maps on the named interval, and L1(I;E) forcing.

Goal: Obtain the additional spacetime estimate by applying a bounded map already supplied, without integrating into YI.

1.1F1F2F3given

The continuous function P(t)u(t) has L1(I;E) norm at most (b−a)K∥u∥C. Hence g=Pu+f belongs to L1(I;E). The solution identity is u=Hax+Dag in C(I;E) by [F2]. Both terms on the right have compatible images in YI by the two map hypotheses. Their sum therefore represents u in AI, proving membership in YI with the declared compatibility.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1given

The triangle inequality and the assumed map bounds give ∥u∥YI≤AI∥x∥+BI((b−a)K∥u∥C+∥f∥1). Substituting [F2] proves the displayed estimate. This uses no YI-valued Bochner integral; all integrals used to identify the free map were taken in E. Thus a nonseparable spatial factor in a chosen spacetime norm introduces no additional integration claim.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1∎

Restricting to a shorter interval gives exactly its stated free-map constants, so uniformity cannot be inferred without their uniform bounds. For a backward interval ending at b, set τ=b−t and σ=b−s. Changing variables in the oriented Volterra equation replaces W(t−s) by W(−τ+σ), the perturbation by −P(b−σ) and the forcing by −f(b−σ). This is the same forward problem with reflected group W~(τ)=W(−τ) and coefficient P~(σ)=−P(b−σ). Applying steps 1.1–2.1 under its supplied free-map hypotheses proves the final assertion.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.