Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded real-linear perturbations preserve solution estimates

Statement

Assume Countable Choice, with the real Banach and Bochner conventions of Continuous free convolution on a finite time interval. Let E be a complex Banach space regarded as real, 0<T<∞, W(t) a strongly continuous bounded group, and P:[0,T]→BR(E) a norm-continuous family of bounded real-linear operators. Write M=sup⁡∣t∣≤T∥W(t)∥≥1, K=sup⁡t∈[0,T]∥P(t)∥ and C0=MeMKT. The Volterra equation S(t,r)x=W(t−r)x+∫rtW(t−ρ)P(ρ)S(ρ,r)x dρ has a unique evolution on [0,T]2. It is constructed by A contraction of a nonempty complete metric space into itself has exactly one fixed point, the limit of the iterates from any starting point through Short-interval real Volterra contraction, is jointly strongly continuous and real-linear, satisfies S(r,r)=I, S(t,q)S(q,r)=S(t,r) and S(t,r)−1=S(r,t), and obeys ∥S(t,r)∥≤MeMK∣t−r∣ by Global real evolution, cocycle and inverse and Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients.

For every strongly measurable f∈L1(0,T;E) the forced formula is u(t)=S(t,r)x+∫rtS(t,ρ)f(ρ) dρ, with ∥u∥C([0,T];E)≤C0(∥x∥+∥f∥L1), as proved in Bochner variation of constants for real evolution. It uniquely solves u(t)=W(t−r)x+∫rtW(t−ρ)(P(ρ)u(ρ)+f(ρ)) dρ. All integrals are Bochner integrals in E, oriented by ∫rt=−∫tr for t<r; their norm and real-linearity rules are Bochner integral norm inequality and Linearity of the Bochner integral.

If the actual free orbit map Hay(t)=W(t−a)y and retarded L1(I;E) forcing map Dag(t)=∫atW(t−ρ)g(ρ) dρ are bounded into an additional compatible spacetime Banach norm YI on a forward interval I=[a,b]⊂[0,T], in exactly the common-ambient and map sense of Transfer of a compatible spacetime norm through the free forcing map, with bounds AI and BI, then v=u∣I has that norm. Put fI=f∣I and CI=MeMK(b−a). The estimate in interval data is ∥v∥YI≤AI∥u(a)∥+BI((b−a)KCI(∥u(a)∥+∥fI∥L1(I;E))+∥fI∥L1(I;E)). When r=a, one has u(a)=x, so this gives the estimate with initial datum x and forcing restricted to I. For arbitrary r, one may use the global bound ∥u(a)∥≤C0(∥x∥+∥f∥L1(0,T;E)) on its right-hand side. For fixed free-map bounds the constant in interval data depends only on the interval, M and K; uniform interval estimates require uniform free-map bounds. The corresponding backward assertion uses endpoint datum u(b), forcing restricted to I, and the reflected free maps specified by the same supplier. One may not move multiplication by i through a merely real-linear S(t,r): a forcing −if enters as ∫rtS(t,ρ)(−if(ρ)) dρ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The complex Banach space regarded as real, the strongly continuous bounded group, norm-continuous bounded real-linear P, finite time horizon, and, for the additional assertion, the two specified bounded free maps on the named interval.

Goal: Establish the entire evolution and forced estimate, including the cocycle, inverse and compatible spacetime conclusion, without any Hilbert-space restriction.

[F1]

Continuous free convolution on a finite time interval proves continuity, real linearity and the state-space norm bound for the free convolution using Bochner integral norm inequality and Linearity of the Bochner integral.

[F3]

Bochner variation of constants for real evolution proves the strongly measurable Bochner variation-of-constants formula and its triangular integral exchange, including backward-time signs.

[F4]

Transfer of a compatible spacetime norm through the free forcing map transfers the norm on I=[a,b] for a solution based at a, using its datum at a, forcing restricted to I, and the same bounded free orbit and forcing maps in the common ambient function or distribution space. It makes no claim of a Bochner integral into a nonseparable spacetime factor.

Proof

Given: The complex Banach space regarded as real, the strongly continuous bounded group, norm-continuous bounded real-linear P, finite time horizon, and, for the additional assertion, the two specified bounded free maps on the named interval.

Goal: Establish the entire evolution and forced estimate, including the cocycle, inverse and compatible spacetime conclusion, without any Hilbert-space restriction.

1.1F1F2given

Use [F1] on an interval of length h with MKh<1. Its forcing estimate shows that the Volterra map has contraction constant at most MKh; [F2] supplies its unique fixed point. Apply the global extension and reset argument of [F2] to obtain the evolution for every base time and the identities S(t,q)S(q,r)=S(t,r) and S(t,r)−1=S(r,t). The same result supplies joint strong continuity and the norm MeMK∣t−r∣.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1

For arbitrary L1(E) forcing, [F3] gives a continuous function by the displayed integral against S(t,ρ), verifies the forced Volterra equation, and uses [F2] to prove uniqueness. Its norm bound together with the homogeneous estimate in step 1.1 gives C0(∥x∥+∥f∥1). Both the initial time and the integral are allowed in either orientation, exactly as asserted.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

On I=[a,b], put v=u∣I and fI=f∣I. The reset identity of [F2], obtained by splitting the oriented Volterra equation at a, is v=Hau(a)+Da(Pv+fI). Thus the interval solution has datum u(a) and forcing fI, regardless of the original base time r. The interval version of steps 1.1 and 2.1 gives ∥v∥C(I;E)≤CI(∥u(a)∥+∥fI∥L1(I;E)), with CI=MeMK(b−a). Applying [F4] to these exact interval data and using ∥Pv+fI∥L1(I;E)≤(b−a)K∥v∥C(I;E)+∥fI∥L1(I;E) proves the stated YI estimate. If r=a, then u(a)=x; otherwise step 2.1 gives the stated global bound for ∥u(a)∥. The constants are precisely those of the supplied interval maps, so uniformity requires their uniform bounds. For a backward interval ending at b, the change of variables τ=b−t gives datum u(b), group W~(τ)=W(−τ), coefficient P~(σ)=−P(b−σ), and forcing f~(σ)=−f(b−σ). Applying [F4] under the corresponding reflected free-map hypotheses gives the backward assertion. Finally all operator linearity used here is real, so the factor −i stays inside S(t,ρ) when it is part of the forcing. This proves all conclusions.

Depends on

Used by · 7

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.