How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coercivity and bounded trajectory control operator
PDF p. 19: Proof of Theorem 1.4, coercivity and conclusion
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and hypotheses (H), (W), and (UCPw) of Proposition 4.6: conditional adjoint observability. In particular, , is the connected exterior of a smooth compact nontrapping obstacle, is the specified reference trajectory, and the stated energy-level unique continuation property holds. Let , , and . Regard these complex spectral Hilbert spaces as real Hilbert spaces. Let be the real-linear adjoint evolution, the real control cutoff, and the backward-control map of Real HUM operator for the trajectory linearization. The pivot pairing is linear in its first variable.
For every ,
where is the observability constant for . The bounded real-linear map is a bijection with bounded inverse. Consequently the map defined in Real HUM operator for the trajectory linearization is bounded and real-linear and selects a control steering the linearized system between any prescribed endpoints in .
Facts & Assumptions
The construction in Real HUM operator for the trajectory linearization sets , , , and , where and . It supplies bounded real-linear and a bounded path-valued map . Once has bounded inverse, its displayed formula for gives the claimed steering and boundedness.
By Scale Riesz map and free HUM operator and Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation, is an onto isometry and for the real part of the inner product. The common spectral core is dense in . Realification preserves the Hilbert norms by Realification of Hilbert pairings and conjugate-linear coefficients.
The forward and adjoint evolutions are uniformly bounded and strongly continuous on the relevant scale levels: for each fixed datum, its orbit is norm-continuous in that scale space Forward and backward real-linear propagators. The potential operators are norm-continuous bounded operators on those levels, with negative-level actions defined by pivot duality Time-dependent potential and conjugation bounds on the scale. The real cutoff is bounded on both and and its negative-level action is the pivot transpose of its positive-level action Cutoff multipliers through order two and by duality. The mild solutions obey the oriented Duhamel formula of Bounded real-linear perturbations preserve solution estimates.
For strong solutions of the linearized and adjoint systems, Real pairing cancellation for the linearized-adjoint pair gives .
For , Proposition 4.6: conditional adjoint observability gives . Under Countable Choice, the observation Gramian of a bounded real-linear observation with this lower bound is a bounded isomorphism Observation lower bounds give Hilbert control right inverses. Full Choice is assumed The Axiom of Choice.
The time-space definition Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces gives as the real vector space of almost-everywhere classes of strongly measurable -valued functions with norm . Sums and scalar multiples are strongly measurable and their norms are measurable. Under Countable Choice, Bochner Lp is complete for a Banach value space makes this norm complete for every real Banach value space, with ; no separability hypothesis is required. The assumed Axiom of Choice supplies Countable Choice.
Pointwise Cauchy–Schwarz bounds by Cauchy–Schwarz: |⟨ x,y⟩|≤‖x‖ ‖y‖, with equality exactly for dependent pairs. Scalar Hölder with exponents bounds by for nonnegative measurable Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases.
Proof
Given: The hypotheses and constructions in the Statement, with .
Goal: Establish the pairing identity and coercivity, invert , and obtain the bounded endpoint-control selection.
First take in the common spectral core and use the control in the backward equation for . The data and control are in : , multiplication by preserves that space, and increases spectral order. The Duhamel equations, the free group on , and norm-continuity of the potential operators show that and are continuous in and continuously differentiable in . Indeed the Duhamel integrands are continuous in ; differentiating the free-group convolution in gives the displayed differential equations. Thus the strong pairing identity applies.
Integrating that identity from to , using , yields . Since and is real, the cutoff transpose identity and the scale Riesz identity turn the integrand into . Both sides are continuous real-bilinear functions of : use the boundedness of , the pivot pairing, the uniform evolution and cutoff bounds, and the finite length of the time interval. Density of the spectral core therefore extends the identity to all :
Give the real pairing . Since is a real Hilbert space, it is a real Banach space, so the completeness theorem applies to , , and the finite interval under the assumed Choice. For strongly measurable , the real polarization identity makes the integrand measurable. Cauchy–Schwarz in and scalar Hölder show , so the pairing is finite and independent of representatives. Pointwise bilinearity and symmetry pass to the integral; its diagonal equals , which vanishes exactly for the zero class because this is the norm in F6. Thus this pairing is an inner product inducing the complete Bochner norm, and is a real Hilbert space.
Define by . Each observation orbit is norm-continuous by F3. The finite-range step functions taking its value at the left endpoint of each interval of the partition into equal pieces converge pointwise to it as , so the orbit is strongly measurable. If and , then . Thus is bounded and real-linear between the real Hilbert spaces and , and observability gives . Let . The Gramian result makes a bounded isomorphism of . By step 1.2 and the scale pairing identity, : their real inner products with every coincide. Since is a bounded isomorphism, is a bounded isomorphism from to . Taking in step 1.2 gives the displayed identity and coercivity.
The inverse just obtained satisfies the additional hypothesis in the definition of . For endpoints , that definition takes and . Its backward controlled solution starts at and ends at zero; adding the homogeneous solution with terminal value gives initial value and terminal value . The boundedness and real linearity of the inverse, propagator and path-valued control map give the corresponding properties of . This proves all conclusions.
Source notes
The original article is cited for attribution of the HUM construction and conclusion. The proof above uses the stated mathematical suppliers; the article's assertion is not used as its own premise. The Choice assumption records the hypotheses of the supplied functional-analytic results.
Depends on
- Real HUM operator for the trajectory linearization
- Scale Riesz map and free HUM operator
- Real pairing cancellation for the linearized-adjoint pair
- Proposition 4.6: conditional adjoint observability
- Forward and backward real-linear propagators
- Time-dependent potential and conjugation bounds on the scale
- Cutoff multipliers through order two and by duality
- Positive spectral Hilbert scale: duality and interpolation
- Bounded real-linear perturbations preserve solution estimates
- Realification of Hilbert pairings and conjugate-linear coefficients
- Observation lower bounds give Hilbert control right inverses
- The Axiom of Choice
- Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces
- Bochner Lp is complete for a Banach value space
- Cauchy–Schwarz: |⟨ x,y⟩|≤‖x‖ ‖y‖, with equality exactly for dependent pairs
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Nonlinear Schrödinger equation in an exterior domain, v2 · PDF page 19, proof of Theorem 1.4