Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Endpoint feedback around a trajectory

PDF p. 20: definitions of Nw, hz and Tw

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let n≥2, T>0, and let Ω=Rn∖Θ be the connected exterior of a nonempty smooth compact nontrapping obstacle. This is hypothesis (H): every generalized reflected ray in the exterior leaves every compact set in finite time, with the generalized reflected-ray convention of the exterior geometry. Choose R>0 with Θ⊂BR(0) and a real-valued φ∈C∞(Rn;[0,1]) such that φ(x)=0 for ∣x∣≤R, φ(x)>0 for ∣x∣>R, and φ(x)=1 for ∣x∣≥R+1. Put ω={x∈Ω:∣x∣>R}. Let λ∈R∖{0} and let w satisfy (W): w∈C([0,T];HD2(Ω)∩W2,∞(Ω)) and i∂tw+Δw+λ∣w∣2w=0 distributionally. Assume (UCPw): every C([0,T];H01(Ω)) solution of the adjoint equation ivt+Δv+2λ∣w∣2v−λw2v‾=0 that vanishes on (0,T)×ω is identically zero.

Take s∈{1,2} and set E=HDs(Ω)=D((I−ΔD)s/2), with its spectral norm. Here ΔD is the Dirichlet Laplacian. Regard E as a real Banach space. Let S(t,r) be the real-linear homogeneous evolution for izt+ΔDz+2λ∣w∣2z+λw2z‾=0. Let Gw:E×E→C([0,T];E) be the bounded real-linear selector which steers this linearized system between its two input endpoints with control h appearing as φh. Use the same R, ω and φ for (UCPw), Gw and the control multiplier.

For z∈C([0,T];E) such that F(w,z)=λ(2w∣z∣2+w‾z2+∣z∣2z) is strongly measurable and belongs to L1(0,T;E), and for prescribed endpoints z0,zT∈E, define

Nw(z)(t)=∫0tS(t,r)(iF(w,z)(r)) dr,hz=Gw(z0,zT−Nw(z)(T)),

and

Tw(z)(t)=S(t,0)z0+Nw(z)(t)+∫0tS(t,r)(−iφhz(r)) dr.

The L1(0,T;E) space uses Lebesgue time measure and almost-everywhere classes of strongly measurable maps with integrable E norm. The integrals are Bochner integrals in the realification of E, and C([0,T];E) denotes norm-continuous paths. Thus the definition gives Nw(z),Tw(z)∈C([0,T];E) and hz∈C([0,T];E). It applies to any chosen control space XT⊂C([0,T];E) once its members satisfy the displayed remainder condition; invariance of XT and contraction are separate assertions.

Justification

The exterior geometry, one-sided smooth-obstacle and generalized reflected-ray conventions, and nontrapping hypothesis (H) are those of Exterior and truncated obstacle domains. The radius, observation region and smooth real cutoff are chosen as in Control region and nested real cutoffs, consistently for (UCPw), the selector and the multiplier. The trajectory hypothesis is that of Reference trajectory hypothesis W, and the displayed unique-continuation implication is the conditional hypothesis of Conditional energy-level unique continuation hypothesis. The spectral scale, Dirichlet operator and complete normed state space are supplied by Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality, under the Choice assumption recorded in The Axiom of Choice. The expression for F and the meaning of the trajectory remainder are supplied by Quadratic-cubic remainder after subtracting a trajectory.

The strong-measurability convention, Lebesgue-time L1(0,T;E) space and Bochner integration are supplied by Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces; its countable-choice assumption is covered by the stated Axiom of Choice.

Under these hypotheses, Coercivity and bounded trajectory control operator supplies the bounded real-linear selector Gw and its endpoint-steering property. The evolution and the continuous path obtained by integrating an L1(0,T;E) forcing are supplied by Duhamel formula for a real-linear propagator. Hence the assumed remainder condition makes Nw(z) a continuous E-valued path, so Nw(z)(T) is a valid input to Gw. The resulting hz is continuous in E. By Cutoff multipliers through order two and by duality, multiplication by φ is bounded on E; consequently −iφhz is continuous and therefore integrable on the finite interval. The same evolution result makes the last integral and Tw(z) continuous. The factors i and −i remain inside S(t,r) because this evolution is only assumed real-linear.

Source notes

The original article supplies the notation and definitions on PDF page 20. It is cited for attribution; the stated suppliers justify the domain and well-definedness. No nonlinear existence or contraction claim is made by this definition.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources