Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quadratic-cubic remainder after subtracting a trajectory

PDF p. 20: (4.6)

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let T>0, let Ω⊂Rn and λ∈R∖{0} be as in the reference trajectory hypothesis (W), and let w satisfy (W). Thus w∈C([0,T];HD2(Ω)∩W2,∞(Ω)) and i∂tw+Δw+λ∣w∣2w=0 in distributions. Let φ be the control cutoff and put V1=2λ∣w∣2 and V2=λw2.

For a complex-valued state v, set z=v−w. The trajectory remainder is the pointwise expression

F(w,z)=λ(2w∣z∣2+w‾z2+∣z∣2z).

Here w‾ is complex conjugation and ∣z∣ is the complex modulus. If v and w have endpoint values and v(0)=v0, v(T)=vT, define z0=v0−w(0) and zT=vT−w(T).

For this distributional interpretation put Q=(0,T)×Ω. Write u∈Lloc3(Q) when u:Q→C is Lebesgue measurable and ∫K∣u∣3 dt dx<∞ for every compact K⊂Q; functions equal almost everywhere are identified. A measurable function f is locally integrable on Q when ∫K∣f∣ dt dx<∞ for every such K. Each locally integrable term f is interpreted as the regular distribution ⟨Tf,η⟩=∫Qfη dt dx for η∈Cc∞(Q;C), with no conjugation.

For example, if v∈Lloc3((0,T)×Ω) and φh is locally integrable, the cubic controlled equation for v is equivalent, in space-time distributions, to

i∂tz+Δz+V1z+V2z‾+F(w,z)=φh.

When the chosen solution class also provides homogeneous Dirichlet traces and endpoint values, subtracting w gives the same homogeneous boundary condition for z and the endpoint conditions z(0)=z0, z(T)=zT. The distributional interior equation alone does not assert the existence of those traces or of a solution.

Justification

The reference trajectory, its equation, and the inherited Choice assumption are specified by Reference trajectory hypothesis W and The Axiom of Choice. The cutoff and controlled cubic equation are those of Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems, while Linearized equation and its real-duality adjoint supplies the coefficients V1 and V2.

The conjugation and modulus conventions are those of Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus. Using the laws in Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz̄=|z|², and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive and ordinary complex multiplication, expansion gives ∣w+z∣2(w+z)=∣w∣2w+2∣w∣2z+w2z‾+2w∣z∣2+w‾z2+∣z∣2z. Hence the definition is precisely the part left after subtracting the trajectory cubic term and the terms real-linear in z.

The compact-local convention above defines Lloc3(Q) directly using measurable representatives and the complex modulus. The meaning of local integrability and the regular-distribution construction are supplied by Locally integrable functions as regular distributions and its defining regular-functional prerequisite. The assumed Axiom of Choice covers that supplier's Countable Choice hypothesis; its construction and linearity themselves require no choice.

Under the displayed local integrability assumption, w is locally bounded by Reference trajectory hypothesis W. For each compact K⊂Q, the bound ∣z∣3≤4(∣v∣3+∣w∣3) implies ∫K∣z∣3<∞. The inequalities ∣z∣j≤1+∣z∣3 for j=1,2, the finite measure of K, and the local boundedness of w show that every term of the expansion is locally integrable. By Locally integrable functions as regular distributions, these terms and the forcing define distributions through the complex-linear map f↦Tf. Linearity of distributional derivatives and subtraction of the equation for w yield the displayed remainder equation; reversing the same calculation recovers the equation for v. The interpretation of distributional equality and the limitation on endpoint and boundary traces are those of Distributional equation convention for complex Schrödinger solutions. In a class with linear trace and endpoint maps, subtracting the corresponding values gives the stated conditions for z.

Source notes

Equation (4.6) on PDF page 20 of the original article supplies the attribution and notation. The algebraic calculation above uses the named mathematical suppliers; the article is not used as proof of its own claim.

Depends on

Used by · 4

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources