Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The L2 pivot injects into the local negative Sobolev space

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), in particular the Countable Choice used by the cited Sobolev completeness and test-function density theorems. Let G⊂Rn be open, n≥1, and let K=R or C. Set V=H02(G)=Cc∞(G)‾H2(G) with the full Sobolev norm of Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms and closure convention Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure. Let Y be its continuous dual in the real case, or its continuous conjugate dual in the complex case: F(αφ)=α‾F(φ) and ∥F∥Y=sup⁡∥φ∥V≤1∣F(φ)∣. The ordinary linear dual is The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm. Then V,Y are Banach by Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach, A closed subspace of a Banach space is Banach and If Y is Banach then B(X,Y) is Banach. The map J:L2(G)→Y, (Jf)(φ)=∫Gfφ‾, is linear, bounded and injective, with ∥Jf∥Y≤∥f∥L2(G). Here Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases provides the bound and Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L² provides injectivity. No compactness of L2(G)→Y is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open set G, the full H2 norm including its zero-order L2 term, and the declared scalar field.

Goal: Prove Banachness of the negative value space and justify its pivot embedding, including injectivity.

[F1]

H2(G) is Banach under the stated choice assumption (Integer-order Sobolev spaces are Banach, The Axiom of Choice). The definition Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure places every test function in H2(G) and defines V as its metric closure there. The full norm satisfies ∥φ∥2≤∥φ∥V (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms). Once linearity of V has been established, A closed subspace of a Banach space is Banach applies to this closed subspace.

[F2]

The bounded linear operator space into a Banach scalar field is Banach (If Y is Banach then B(X,Y) is Banach); its norm on functionals is the dual norm (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm).

[F3]

Holder at exponent 2, applied to the real-valued absolute values of representatives, bounds the absolute pairing (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases). Smooth compactly supported functions are dense in L2(G) under Countable Choice (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L²).

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, on real or complex L2(G) the formula ⟨f,g⟩=∫Gfg‾ is a well-defined pairing of almost-everywhere classes. It is linear in its first variable, additive in its second variable and conjugate-linear there in the complex case, with ⟨f,f⟩=∥f∥22 (L² with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space). The assumed Axiom of Choice supplies this Countable Choice, as it does for the other cited interfaces.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

The test functions form a linear subspace of H2(G): 0 is a test function, and aφ+bψ is smooth with support contained in the compact union supp⁡φ∪supp⁡ψ⊂G for scalars a,b and test functions φ,ψ. Let u,v∈V, a,b∈K and ε>0. By the closure criterion in [F1], choose test functions φ,ψ such that ∥u−φ∥H2,∥v−ψ∥H2<ε/(1+∣a∣+∣b∣). The norm axioms give ∥au+bv−(aφ+bψ)∥H2≤∣a∣∥u−φ∥H2+∣b∣∥v−ψ∥H2<ε. Thus au+bv∈V. Also 0∈V, so V is a linear subspace; it is closed because it is the metric closure of the test functions.

1.2F1F2F3F4given

By [F4], (Jf)(φ)=⟨f,φ⟩ is independent of the representatives of f and φ, is additive in φ, and has the asserted linear or conjugate-linear scalar dependence. By [F3] and [F1], ∣(Jf)(φ)∣≤∥f∥2∥φ∥2≤∥f∥2∥φ∥V. Thus it belongs to Y. Its dependence on f is linear by [F4], and taking the supremum over the unit ball of V proves ∥Jf∥Y≤∥f∥2.

2.1F1F2step 1.1given

By [F1] and step 1.1, V is a closed linear subspace of the Banach space H2(G), so the closed-subspace theorem proves V Banach. In the real case [F2] proves Y Banach. In the complex case the map F↦F‾, with (F‾)(φ)=F(φ)‾, is a distance-preserving bijection from the conjugate dual to the ordinary linear dual. A Cauchy sequence in Y therefore has a limit there, since its conjugates converge in the ordinary dual and the inverse conjugation preserves distances.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.2given∎

If Jf=0, choose φm∈Cc∞(G)⊂V with ∥f−φm∥2<1/m for m≥1, using [F3] and Countable Choice from the assumed Axiom of Choice. Each ⟨f,φm⟩=(Jf)(φm) vanishes. By additivity and the diagonal identity in [F4], ∥f∥22=⟨f,f⟩=⟨f,f−φm⟩. The bound in [F3] gives ∣⟨f,f−φm⟩∣≤∥f∥2∥f−φm∥2→0. Hence ∥f∥22=0, so f=0 as an L2 class and J is injective.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.