Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Prior compact-manifold control under GCC and unique continuation

PDF p. 2: end of §1.2

Statement

For compact manifolds without boundary, the article reports semi-global internal controllability and stabilization for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation under a geometric control condition and a unique continuation assumption: it attributes the two-dimensional result to Dehman, Gérard and Lebeau [15], and the three-dimensional result to Laurent [23]. It also points to [11] for the fractional Schrödinger equation. These are background attributions, not a theorem asserted here for exterior domains.

Facts & Assumptions

A smooth manifold without boundary is a topological manifold equipped with a smooth structure, as in Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts. Compactness means that every open cover has a finite subcover, as in Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right. These describe the compact-manifold setting of the comparison; the exterior domain studied in the article is not thereby assumed compact.

In the local terminology of Reachability and observation vocabulary for controlled evolutions, internal control acts through a source in a specified region of the manifold, with any boundary data prescribed independently of the control. In the endpoint language of Reachability and observation vocabulary for controlled evolutions, exact controllability means that each allowed pair of initial and terminal states can be joined by an admissible controlled solution. Semi-global describes a result for arbitrarily prescribed bounded sets of states, with parameters and hypotheses allowed to depend on the chosen bound; it does not mean an unqualified global result with uniform constants. Stabilization concerns decay toward a specified equilibrium under a specified damped or feedback evolution. The cited language defines exponential stabilization when an exponential rate is actually asserted; this remark does not prescribe a decay rate.

For the compact comparison, supply a smooth Riemannian metric g on the Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold M without boundary, in the sense of Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold. Its Levi–Civita connection ∇ is the metric-compatible torsion-free affine connection of Levi civita connection; existence and uniqueness for the supplied metric follow from Fundamental theorem of riemannian geometry. A geodesic is affinely parametrized for this connection: Dtγ′(t)=0, as in Geodesic of an affine connection. Unit speed means ∣γ′(t)∣g=gγ(t)(γ′(t),γ′(t))=1, as in Riemannian speed and length. Using the boundaryless complete-geodesic convention recorded in the External input of Independent generalized reflected-ray and GCC convention, for a specified open control region ω⊆M, GCC means that there is a common T>0 such that every complete unit-speed geodesic γ:R→M satisfies γ(t)∈ω for some t∈(0,T). This uses only that supplier’s boundaryless convention, not its reflected-ray structures for Euclidean domains. In the local terminology of Reachability and observation vocabulary for controlled evolutions, a unique continuation assumption is an additional implication that a solution in a specified class which vanishes on the relevant observation region must vanish throughout the relevant domain. These local explanations do not identify the detailed continuation hypotheses in the cited papers. The precise equations, solution classes, observation intervals and hypotheses belong to the individual results; neither condition is proved by this remark.

Source notes

The article's end of §1.2 gives these attributions. Its bibliography identifies [15] as Dehman, Gérard and Lebeau, Stabilization and control for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on a compact surface; [23] as Laurent, Global controllability and stabilization for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation on some compact manifolds of dimension 3; and [11] as Capistrano–Filho and Pampu, The fractional Schrödinger equation on compact manifolds: global controllability results. The original article is cited for its account of prior work, not as a proof of the attributed results. This remark does not independently assert the detailed theorem statements of those references.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources