How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Theorem 1.2: linear control on the full stated scale
PDF p. 4: Theorem 1.2; PDF p. 13: conclusion of Theorem 3.6 proof
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and hypothesis (H): , the nonempty compact obstacle has smooth boundary, its exterior is connected, and its generalized reflected rays leave every compact set in finite time. Let and the real smooth cutoff be as in Control region and nested real cutoffs. Let and . For every , there is a control such that the linear system , with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition and initial state , has a mild solution satisfying .
Here is the Dirichlet spectral Hilbert scale associated with , and denotes norm-continuous paths. The homogeneous boundary condition is encoded by the Dirichlet realization and its scale; at negative orders the solution is understood in the corresponding mild evolution sense.
Facts & Assumptions
Under the stated geometry, cutoff, Choice assumption, and , Theorem 3.6: bounded continuous control operator gives a bounded complex-linear operator . For each endpoint pair, its control produces the unique mild solution of the stated linear system with initial value and terminal value .
The linear equation and cutoff convention are those of Linear and nonlinear internally controlled exterior systems and Control region and nested real cutoffs; its scale and norm-continuous path notation are fixed by Dirichlet spectral Sobolev scale and duality and Continuous and mixed time-space function spaces. The geometric convention is that of Non-trapping obstacle, and the Choice assumption is recorded in The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
Given: The geometry, Choice assumption, cutoff, , and endpoints in the Statement.
Goal: Find a continuous control and a continuous mild solution joining the two endpoints.
The given hypotheses match those of F1. Apply its operator to the given endpoints and set . Its codomain gives .
F1 supplies the unique mild solution for this control, continuous in , with initial state and terminal state . By F2 this is the linear system and terminology in the Statement. Thus the chosen and solution have all the required properties.
Source notes
The frozen article is cited for attribution of Theorem 1.2. The deduction above uses Theorem 3.6: bounded continuous control operator, rather than the article's statement of Theorem 1.2, as its proof input. The Choice hypothesis is inherited from the stated supplier and is not attributed to the article.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.