Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact AIK global, horizon and quantitative hypotheses

Definition

The AIK quantitative stationary package is the following collection of data and assumptions; it is separate from a generic bifurcate Killing horizon and from other black-hole comparison packages.

Let (M,g,N,o) be a connected oriented, time-oriented, paracompact smooth Lorentzian four-manifold without boundary of signature (−,+,+,+), with Ric⁡(g)=0 and a smooth Killing field T. Let Er={x∈R3:∣x∣>r} and let Φ0:E1/2→Σ0⊂M be a diffeomorphism onto an embedded spacelike partial Cauchy hypersurface. Here partial Cauchy means acausal and edgeless: no two distinct points are causally related, and there is no q∈Σ0‾ such that every neighborhood U of q contains a timelike curve, avoiding Σ0, from a point of IU−(q) to a point of IU+(q). No claim that it is Cauchy for all of M is imposed. Write Σr=Φ0(Er) and S0=Φ0({∣x∣=1}). Require Σ1 to be maximal. Let ν be the future unit normal to Σ0, h=g∣TΣ0, n=−g(T,ν), and X=T−nν.

GR. For sufficiently large R0, the map on ER0 extends to a diffeomorphism Φ0:R×ER0→Mend onto an open end, with T=∂0. Put r=∣x∣. There are M0>0 and S1,S2,S3∈R, with J=((S1)2+(S2)2+(S3)2)1/2<M02, such that g00=−1+2M0/r+O6(r−2), gij=δij+O6(r−1), and g0i=−2ϵijkSjxk/r3+O6(r−3). The alternating symbol has ϵ123=1. Differentiated bounds count all coordinate derivatives through total order six, including x0 derivatives (which vanish on this stationary end). Set E=IM−(Mend)∩IM+(Mend). Require E to be globally hyperbolic, Σ0∩IM−(Mend)=Σ0∩IM+(Mend)=Σ1, T≠0 on E, and every T-orbit in E to be complete and intersect Σ1 transversely.

SBS. In a neighborhood O of S0, require H+=O∩∂MIM−(Mend) and H−=O∩∂MIM+(Mend) to be smooth embedded null non-expanding hypersurfaces intersecting transversely in S0. Here is the precise non-expansion convention, which applies to either null hypersurface H=H±. Let Lp=TpH∩(TpH)⊥g be its null normal line and Qp=TpH/Lp the two-dimensional quotient. Its positive-definite metric is qp([U],[V])=gp(U,V), with [U] denoting the class modulo Lp. For a smooth nowhere-zero local section ℓ of L, the null second fundamental form is the symmetric form on Q given by Bℓ([U],[V])=g(∇Uℓ,V), where U,V are tangent to H and ∇ is the ambient Levi–Civita connection. Tangential covariant differentiation may use any smooth ambient extension of ℓ. Its expansion is θℓ=tr⁡qBℓ=qAB(Bℓ)AB, where A,B=1,2 label any local frame of Q and (qAB) is the inverse quotient metric. The hypersurface is non-expanding when θℓ=0 on every such local domain. The local justification below proves well-definedness and θfℓ=fθℓ for every smooth nowhere-zero real function f, so this vanishing condition needs no normal scale or affine parametrization. Require T to be tangent to both and not identically zero on S0. These conditions do not identify T with a horizon-generating Killing field vanishing on S0.

Quantitative choices. Fix large A1≥2 and R1≥max⁡(R0,A14,8M0,2A1,2). On Σ3/4 require A1−1∣v∣2≤hijvivj≤A1∣v∣2 and ∑i=13∣g(∂i,T)∣+∣g(ν,T)∣≤A1. On the restricted end Φ0(R×ER1) require ∑m=06rm+1∑j,k=13∣∂m(gjk−δjk)∣+∑m=06rm+2∣∂m(g00+1−2M0/r)∣+∑m=06rm+3∑i=13∣∂m(g0i+2ϵijkSjxkr−3)∣≤A1.

Here ∣∂mu∣ is the sum over all four-coordinate derivatives of total order m; the displayed decay bound is imposed on Φ0(R×ER1), rather than on all of the original R0 end.

As in source §1.2, specify a smooth cutoff χ:R→[0,1] supported in (−∞,2] and equal to one on (−∞,1]. Specify a smooth ambient vector field T′ in a neighborhood of Σ3/4 and on Φ0(R×E2R1), with T′=χ(r/R1)ν+(1−χ(r/R1))T on Σ3/4 and T′=T on Φ0(R×E2R1). For 0<η0<1/4 sufficiently small, require the local flow of T′ to give the diffeomorphism Φ1:(−η0,η0)×E1−η0→M~, with Φ1(t,x)=Fl⁡tT′(Φ0(x)) and ∂0=T′ in these coordinates. Require Φ1(0,x)=Φ0(x) for x∈E1−η0 and Φ1(t,x)=Φ0(t,x) for (t,x)∈(−η0,η0)×E2R1. No stationary-coordinate agreement is required for R0<r≤2R1 away from the slice. Require ∑j=13∣g0j∣+∣g00+1∣≤A1/(R1+r) throughout M~ in the Φ1 coordinates, and put A2=sup⁡M~∑m=06(∑α,β=03∣∂mgαβ∣+∑α=03∣∂mTα∣),A=max⁡(R1,A2,η0−1,(M02−J)−1)<∞.

The source uses ϵ0 for η0 and ϵ for the independent horizon-smallness parameter. The extra lower bounds R1≥8M0,2A1,2 are a choice of a sufficiently large end radius, permitted before fixing A; they impose no smallness assumption on a spacetime. One can enlarge the end radius and redo the source's cutoff construction before fixing the quantitative constants.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Work in ZFC, including the axiom of choice and its inherited countable and dependent choice uses. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The Lorentzian, stationary-field, curvature and index conventions, including the inverse metric and the torsion-free metric-compatible Levi–Civita connection, are those of Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions.

[F2]

The horizon vocabulary distinguishes the stationary field from a Killing generator and defines nullness, the radical null normal line and bifurcation transversality. The quotient metric, null second fundamental form and expansion are defined locally in the present Definition and justified below. Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization

[F3]

Spacelike sections, the future unit normal, maximality, lapse and shift use Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data.

[F4]

Fixed-chart differentiated decay uses Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity; the present Definition explicitly extends its derivative counting to the four source coordinates.

[F5]

Exterior chronological sets, completeness, transversality and global hyperbolicity have the domain-relative meanings of Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data.

[F6]

The independent source assumption contract is recorded in External input.

[F7]

The local-flow notation for T′ uses Local and global flows generated by a vector field on the open neighborhood where T′ is smooth. Its domain and integral-curve laws require neither a Killing field nor completeness; the uniform time interval, chart diffeomorphism and agreement properties remain imposed hypotheses.

Justification

Given: The data and hypotheses in the Definition, with the set-theoretic convention [A1].

Goal: Verify that the package is a definite collection of hypotheses, without asserting its existence.

1.1 The specified charts and section determine r, all component derivatives, the end, the exterior, and the sphere. The geometric interfaces make the smoothness, causal, spacelike-normal and maximality conditions predicates on these data. The flow notation is interpreted on the open neighborhood where T′ is specified, in the sense of [F7]. The flow chart uses E1−η0⊂E3/4, and its agreement sets are the slice and (−η0,η0)×E2R1; on the latter the interpolating field equals T. The decay sum uses only the restricted R1 end. These charts, interpolation and inequalities are supplied hypotheses, not conclusions of generic stationarity. The SBS tangencies concern T, whereas a Killing generator in [F2] is separately specified; the two are not equated. [given, F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7]

1.2 For a local defining function u of the embedded null hypersurface H, du≠0 and H={u=0} locally. Nondegeneracy gives a smooth nonzero normal g−1(du) spanning (TH)⊥g, which is one-dimensional and contained in TH by nullness. Thus L is a smooth line bundle with local nonzero sections. At any point, normalize the supplied timelike orientation vector to e0, with g(e0,e0)=−1. A nonzero null vector can be written ℓ=a(e0+e1), with a≠0 and e1∈e0⊥ of length one. The space e0⊥ is positive definite by signature (−,+,+,+). Every U∈TH=ℓ⊥ then has the unique form U=b(e0+e1)+v with v∈e0⊥∩e1⊥. For V=c(e0+e1)+w, g(U,V)=g(v,w). This proves that q is well-defined and positive definite on the two-dimensional quotient Q; smoothness follows in local quotient frames from smoothness of g and L. [given, F1, F2, algebra]

2.1 For tangent fields U,V, metric compatibility gives g(∇Uℓ,V)=−g(ℓ,∇UV). Torsion freedom and tangency of [U,V] give Bℓ(U,V)−Bℓ(V,U)=−g(ℓ,[U,V])=0. Also g(∇Uℓ,ℓ)=12U(g(ℓ,ℓ))=0, so symmetry makes both slots vanish on L. The expression is bilinear over smooth functions in U,V, descends to Q, and is independent of representatives. Any two ambient extensions of ℓ differ by a field vanishing along H, whose covariant derivative in a tangent direction vanishes there; hence the formula is extension-independent and defines a smooth symmetric form. [step 1.2, F1, F2, algebra]

3.1 The positive-definite quotient metric has an inverse, so the contraction defining θℓ is independent of the quotient frame. For any smooth nowhere-zero f, the connection product rule gives g(∇U(fℓ),V)=fg(∇Uℓ,V)+(Uf)g(ℓ,V)=fBℓ([U],[V]). Consequently Bfℓ=fBℓ and θfℓ=fθℓ. Every pair of local nonzero sections of L differs by such an f on their overlap. Thus vanishing of the expansion is independent of all local choices and defines the non-expansion predicate used in SBS. [step 1.2, step 2.1, F1, F2, algebra]

4.1 The finite derivative sums and the displayed supremum define A2 as an extended nonnegative number; the explicit finiteness requirement makes A finite. The strict condition J<M02 makes its last term positive and finite. Fixing these charts and bounds before choosing a small horizon parameter makes dependence on A unambiguous. Choosing the end radius sufficiently large, and the flow interval sufficiently small, is the source §1.2 convention and does not infer existence of any unassumed geometric object. Together with the local null-form calculation, this makes the entire package a definite collection of hypotheses. [step 1.1, step 3.1, F4, F6, algebra] ∎

External input

AIK §§1.1–1.2 supplies the GR, SBS, maximal-section and quantitative-coordinate assumption contract (1.1)–(1.4), (1.6)–(1.10), including the restricted end for (1.7) and the slice/far-end agreement for the flow chart. These are imposed assumptions, not conclusions of generic stationarity, an I-plus-regularity equivalence or a local reconstruction of a rigidity theorem. The null quotient metric, second fundamental form and scale-invariant zero-expansion predicate are supplied by the local Definition and Justification, rather than imported as an unstated source theorem. Minguzzi Definitions 2.130 and 3.35 supply the edge and partial-Cauchy conventions.

Depends on

Used by · 5

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

S. Alexakis, A. D. Ionescu and S. Klainerman, Rigidity of stationary black holes with small angular momentum on the horizon · §1.1.1–§1.1.2, (1.1)–(1.4), SBS, PDF pp. 3–4; §1.2 (1.6)–(1.10), PDF pp. 5–6

The source specifies the GR and SBS hypotheses, the maximal section and quantitative bounds (1.6)-(1.10). Bound (1.7) holds on Phi0(R times E_R1); the flow chart agrees with Phi0 on its initial slice and on (-epsilon0,epsilon0) times E_2R1. The fixed quantitative constant is A=max(R1,A2,epsilon0^-1,(M^2-J)^-1).

Hypotheses: Smooth stationary Ricci-flat spacetime, the specified section/end/horizon, and the quantitative chart bounds stated in the Definition. The end radius is chosen sufficiently large before fixing A.

Reading limits: Consulted the linked PDF text at the assumption paragraphs and formulas on PDF pp. 3–6, including the domains of (1.7) and the interpolation and chart-agreement paragraph before (1.8). The coordinate construction is imposed as part of the package; no existence of a maximal surface or horizon is inferred. The null-form well-definedness and rescaling argument is local, not attributed to these passages. No rigidity proof or separate cited construction was reviewed.

E. Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory · Definition 2.130, PDF p. 76; Definition 3.35, PDF p. 95

A partial Cauchy hypersurface is an acausal edgeless set; the edge predicate is the local timelike-bypass predicate stated in the Definition.

Hypotheses: An achronal subset of a time-oriented spacetime, with chronological relations relative to each specified neighborhood.

Reading limits: Consulted the linked PDF text of Definitions 2.130 and 3.35 on PDF pp. 76 and 95 for the edge and partial-Cauchy terminology. No causality theorem proof was reviewed.

Sources