How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The quantitative asymptotic end is uniformly timelike
Statement
For the AIK quantitative package, on . In particular the stationary field is timelike throughout that end, independently of the horizon-smallness parameter.
Facts & Assumptions
Work in ZFC, including the axiom of choice and its inherited countable and dependent choice uses. The Axiom of Choice
The source end coordinates have , and the chosen radius satisfies and . Exact AIK global, horizon and quantitative hypotheses
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the stated conditional conclusion.
On the end the stationary field is the coordinate vector , so . The zeroth-order term of the quantitative end bound gives .
For , the two positive terms are at most each by the chosen lower bounds on . Hence , as asserted. No horizon estimate enters this calculation.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- S. Alexakis, A. D. Ionescu and S. Klainerman, Rigidity of stationary black holes with small angular momentum on the horizon · Section 1.2, equations (1.6)–(1.10), PDF pages 5–6