How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Connected rotating degenerate vacuum comparison data
Definition
Work in ZFC. A connected rotating degenerate vacuum comparison datum consists of the time-oriented stationary four-dimensional Lorentzian data of Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions, an asymptotically flat selected end, and the -regularity, analyticity and causal-exterior conventions of Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses and Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data. Require . Require that the future event horizon be nonempty and connected, and that it be a smooth Killing horizon for a specified nonzero generator with on its nonzero-generator part and there. Require that fail to be tangent to the null normal line somewhere on ; this is rotation relative to . No bifurcation surface is part of these data.
Here is the domain of outer communications and the flow-saturated selected end. -regularity requires completeness of , global hyperbolicity of , and the finite-end acausal section and once-only horizon-generator cross-section specified by the comparison definition. Connectedness is imposed on the horizon, not merely on that section. These are predicates on supplied data, not assertions that the data exist.
Facts & Assumptions
Stationary geometry, causal sets, -regularity and analytic charts are Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions, Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses and Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data.
Surface gravity, null normal line, the nonzero-generator qualification and rotation are Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization. The inherited choice convention is The Axiom of Choice.
Justification
Given: The supplied geometric objects and the displayed requirements.
Goal: Verify that the comparison class is a well-defined predicate without assuming a bifurcation surface or deriving axial symmetry.
1.1 The causal and comparison interfaces determine , and , so nonemptiness and connectedness are definite topological predicates. The stated completeness, regularity and analyticity requirements are likewise the explicit predicates in [F1]. [given, F1]
2.1 The horizon interface fixes the surface-gravity equation and rotation condition for the supplied fields. It therefore makes and failure of stationary tangency unambiguous. Adding the tensor equation selects vacuum geometries. None of these operations produces an axial field or a bifurcation surface; those would be further results. [given, F1, F2] ∎
Depends on
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Amsel–Horowitz–Marolf–Roberts, Uniqueness of Extremal Kerr and Kerr-Newman Black Holes · §2 Theorem 1, printed p.2; §2 opening proof and footnote 2, printed p.3 (terminology attribution)
- Chruściel and Nguyen, A uniqueness theorem for degenerate Kerr-Newman black holes · Theorem 1.1, printed p.1; explicit I-plus-regular connected rotating degenerate hypotheses (terminology attribution)