Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Connected rotating degenerate vacuum comparison data

Definition

Work in ZFC. A connected rotating degenerate vacuum comparison datum consists of the time-oriented stationary four-dimensional Lorentzian data (M,g,T) of Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions, an asymptotically flat selected end, and the I+-regularity, analyticity and causal-exterior conventions of Staticity, axisymmetry and black-hole regularity hypotheses and Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data. Require Ric⁡(g)=0. Require that the future event horizon H+=IM+(Mext)∩∂MD be nonempty and connected, and that it be a smooth Killing horizon for a specified nonzero generator K with d(g(K,K))=−2κK♭ on its nonzero-generator part and κ=0 there. Require that T fail to be tangent to the null normal line somewhere on H+; this is rotation relative to T. No bifurcation surface is part of these data.

Here D is the domain of outer communications and Mext the flow-saturated selected end. I+-regularity requires completeness of T, global hyperbolicity of D, and the finite-end acausal section and once-only horizon-generator cross-section specified by the comparison definition. Connectedness is imposed on the horizon, not merely on that section. These are predicates on supplied data, not assertions that the data exist.

Facts & Assumptions

[F2]

Surface gravity, null normal line, the nonzero-generator qualification and rotation are Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization. The inherited choice convention is The Axiom of Choice.

Justification

Given: The supplied geometric objects and the displayed requirements.

Goal: Verify that the comparison class is a well-defined predicate without assuming a bifurcation surface or deriving axial symmetry.

1.1 The causal and comparison interfaces determine Mext, D and H+, so nonemptiness and connectedness are definite topological predicates. The stated completeness, regularity and analyticity requirements are likewise the explicit predicates in [F1]. [given, F1]

2.1 The horizon interface fixes the surface-gravity equation and rotation condition for the supplied fields. It therefore makes κ=0 and failure of stationary tangency unambiguous. Adding the tensor equation Ric⁡(g)=0 selects vacuum geometries. None of these operations produces an axial field or a bifurcation surface; those would be further results. [given, F1, F2] ∎

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources