How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The entire target segment stays on the chronological boundary
Statement
Under the same compact-target hypotheses, let be any future causal segment from to a point . Then . In particular this holds for the null geodesic supplied by the compact-target null-segment lemma.
Facts & Assumptions
Work in ZFC; the axiom of choice includes the countable and dependent choice assumptions of the causal suppliers. The Axiom of Choice
The relations and metric-selected connection have the meanings in Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data.
The target is the surface defined in Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data.
The initial point does not belong to . A compact chronological target supplies a causal endpoint
A future null geodesic segment from to some exists under these hypotheses. A compact-target boundary point has a null geodesic segment
Push-up gives and . Push-up rule
Sufficiently short geodesics with prescribed past timelike initial tangent exist smoothly. The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection
Every piecewise curve with future timelike tangents is a future timelike curve in the stipulated locally absolutely continuous class. Curve calculus, clause (c)
Proof
Given: The data and hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the asserted conclusion.
For , causal restriction gives . If , choose with ; push-up would imply , contradicting [F3]. Hence every such is outside .
Fix and use [F7] in to choose a smooth geodesic with and . At one has and . Smoothness of , and makes these scalar functions continuous, so both strict inequalities persist on some within its domain. Thus is past timelike there. For , put . The reversed segment , , is smooth with future timelike tangent; [F8] makes it a future timelike curve in the stipulated class, so , and continuity gives . Push-up and imply , including when . Thus is in the closure of and outside this open set, which places it in its boundary. This argument applies to each , and [F4] supplies the particular null segment.
Depends on
- Causal exterior, chronological boundaries and Cauchy data
- Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data
- A compact chronological target supplies a causal endpoint
- A compact-target boundary point has a null geodesic segment
- The push-up rule: p << q and q <= r imply p << r, together with the timelike-piece criterion
- Openness of the chronological future and past, openness of the chronological relation, and closure of future and past sets
- The geodesic initial-value problem and the exponential map of the metric-selected connection
- Chart independence, concatenation, reparametrization and transitivity for causal curves
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.